Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 70

Thread: Bash vulnerability

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Beans
    352

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    95% of home routers are not secure from 10 different issues that will not get fixed. I recommend shutting down completely when you are not using your computers.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarkrad View Post
    I have both 12.04 and 14.04 and quite a few friends/family machines I look after. Are we/you saying this is not solved at this point?
    It's CVE 2014-6271 and its partially solved. There is another report CVE 2014-7169 that was caused by the prior fix and its unsolved (for now).

    You got the info for testing and the links to both reports in the prior post to yours.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Beans
    148

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    I am in charge of an archive server that doesn't have bash, but it does have sh as the default shell. It runs some proprietary Linux version (actually, I think it might be Ubuntu-based from what I can tell), but it doesn't have apt-get or even any compilers on it. Running the test with "bash" replaced by "sh" reports that it is vulnerable. Does anyone know if there's a patch for sh? Even if there is, I don't know how I would install it since I can't compile anything on it ... I will probably have to get in touch with the vendor.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Beans
    3

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    Sorry if this is a noob question.

    upgraded today to 12.04 LTS

    Code:
    env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test"
    vulnerable
    I followed the 1st post and believe I was successful. Thank you oldrocker99 for this.
    When I run the 1st test I think what is returned is correct
    Code:
    env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' /bin/bash.old -c echo
    vulnerable
    When I run the 2nd test I'm thinking this not correct?
    Code:
    env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c echo
    env: bash: No such file or directory
    Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank You
    TL
    Last edited by translux; September 25th, 2014 at 10:42 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Beans
    300
    Distro
    Xubuntu 22.04 Jammy Jellyfish

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West Hills CA
    Beans
    10,044
    Distro
    Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    So, in effect, any embedded platform that has busybox would be affected as well?
    -------------------------------------
    Oooh Shiny: PopularPages

    Unumquodque potest reparantur. Patientia sit virtus.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Beans
    3

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    Quote Originally Posted by tgalati4 View Post
    So, in effect, any embedded platform that has busybox would be affected as well?
    Negative Busybox is OK
    From the article linked above.

    Iternet of Things (IoT) and embedded devices such as routers may be vulnerable if they’re running BASH. However, many newer devices run a set of tools called BusyBox which offers an alternative to BASH. Devices running BusyBox are not vulnerable to the Bash Bug.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Beans
    14

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    Ubuntu 12.04.5... cleanly re-installed a month ago and updated recently.

    Go to Update Manager and get the new bash.

    Easy.
    Last edited by rob-rushworth; September 26th, 2014 at 04:28 AM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Kubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    we are just talking that it is not so easy since it doesn't solve the problem. it is only partial solution, but at least there is. anyway i am hoping we will have this patched by sunday
    Read the easy to understand, lots of pics Ubuntu manual.
    Do i need antivirus/firewall in linux?
    Full disk backup (newer kernel -> suitable for newer PC): Clonezilla
    User friendly full disk backup: Rescuezilla

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Beans
    310

    Re: [SOLVED]Bash vulnerability

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael_McKenney View Post
    95% of home routers are not secure from 10 different issues that will not get fixed. I recommend shutting down completely when you are not using your computers.
    Would you explain this? I know routers are a weak point,what do I gain by shutting a router down when not in use? Minimize exposure?

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •