Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Which desktop environment would provide me with a simple grid of applications?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Beans
    4,860

    Which desktop environment would provide me with a simple grid of applications?

    This is going to sound a little strange, but basically I have a spare computer here plugged into a monitor. As it stands now, I turn it on and it auto logs in + auto launches Firefox to a custom HTML page. This HTML page pulls in the MJPG feeds from my CCTV network cameras. I'm changing things around a bit. My recordings pull in H264 feed, so the MJPG is basically a viewer. I'd like to get some better FPS on the "surveillance viewer" box, so I'm looking to eliminate the HTML page that serves MJPG and switch to a direct H264 solution. Thing is, as far as I know, you cannot embed a live H264 stream into an HTML file. If it's possible, I'd love to know how.

    Until then, I'm trying to figure out how I can set up a grid of auto launch applications. In particular, VLC. I want to launch 4 instances of VLC in a 2x2 grid format where each VLC instance points to its own RTSP instance. I'm hoping that a desktop environment that 'saves' the session would be a fit.

    I looked at i3 in a VM. It's an interesting environment, but the lack of session save (and the setup involved) seems tedious (unless that's the 2:30 AM side of me talking).

    I don't care what runs on this box. I just want it to log in and auto launch 4 RTSP feeds in 4 different instances of VLC so I would have a 'live viewer' when I'm in my office.

    Anybody have any ideas?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Squidbilly-Land
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Which desktop environment would provide me with a simple grid of applications?

    In the old days, we would write a program startup script that placed windows in the Window Manager. So ... how to do that depends on the WM used. fvwm can do it, but I'd bet that current-gen WMs support this too - like openbox. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=45618 explains.

    BTW, I think HTML5 supports h.264 streams with a nearly trivial media tag. I've only used the audio version.
    Code:
    <audio controls autobuffer autoplay>
      <source src="uc/fun-music.mp3" />
      Your browser does not support the audio element.
    </audio>
    Anyway, hope that helps.
    Last edited by TheFu; July 4th, 2014 at 01:28 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Beans
    4,860

    Re: Which desktop environment would provide me with a simple grid of applications?

    "No video with supported format and MIME type found" when using:

    Code:
    <html>
    <video width="1280" height="800" controls>
      <source src="http://192.168.1.16:554/live3.sdp" type="video/mp4">
      <source src="movie.ogg" type="video/ogg">
      <source src="movie.webm" type="video/webm">
      <object data="movie.mp4" width="1280" height="800">
        <embed src="movie.swf" width="1280" height="800">
      </object>
    </video> 
    </html>
    Found the above on a different post somewhere that I altered for my settings. I get that no matter what tag I've used that I've found (10+).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Squidbilly-Land
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Which desktop environment would provide me with a simple grid of applications?

    Doesn't it need to be a formal html5 document?

    mp4 is a container. Could it be that the vcodec needs to be specified in the mime?
    Also - why are the other source entries there? Are they valid?

    Just some questions - I don't know any answers. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3984.txt might be helpful. There is an h264 type.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Beans
    4,860

    Re: Which desktop environment would provide me with a simple grid of applications?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFu View Post
    Doesn't it need to be a formal html5 document?

    mp4 is a container. Could it be that the vcodec needs to be specified in the mime?
    Also - why are the other source entries there? Are they valid?

    Just some questions - I don't know any answers. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3984.txt might be helpful. There is an h264 type.
    I have no idea if they are valid. They were in the example so I figured I'd leave them to see. I don't know enough (or anything, really) about any sort of HTML tags to use with H264, so I'm kind of blind firing and testing what I read other users talk about on other forums. I'm just pasting the code into a blank test.html document and seeing what happens in Firefox and Chrome. That's it in a nutshell.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •