See this thread forcepae boot option not automatically added in /etc/default/grub and this bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...x/+bug/1307862
Originally Posted by sudodus See this thread forcepae boot option not automatically added in /etc/default/grub and this bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...x/+bug/1307862 I made an mini iso of ubuntu 12.04 and 1310 lubuntu and none of them passes the ubuntu logo (install)(install from command line).
For 13.10 the mini-ISO demands PAE. For 12.04 there are two mini-ISO's. Are you sure that you picked the non-PAE one?
Bringing old hardware back to life. About problems due to upgrading. Please visit Quick Links -> Unanswered Posts. Don't use this space for a list of your hardware. It only creates false hits in the search engines.
Originally Posted by frank18 I made an mini iso of ubuntu 12.04 and 1310 lubuntu and none of them passes the ubuntu logo (install)(install from command line). Forcepae is new and only available in (Trusty to become) 14.04 LTS You can use fake-pae with 13.10. See this link Lubuntu-fake-PAE
Just put the forcepae option after the "--" entry on the installer command line and it will be copied to the target system. The "--" entry defines the boundary between options which are specific to the installer and ones that are copied to the target system. -- Colin Watson, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...105/comments/8
Originally Posted by Temüjin -- Colin Watson, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...105/comments/8 +1 ... and I have edited a wiki page, that will be linked to the Lubuntu wiki page soon. It can be seen now via Edubuntu https://wiki.edubuntu.org/Lubuntu/Ad..._and_Celeron_M
Originally Posted by Temüjin Tainted usually means you're running a binary driver, and kernel devs won't accept bug reports. I don't see how that applies here, since the Pentium M's actually support PAE, but don't report it correctly. I guess if the forcepae option works on other CPU's that really don't support PAE, the tainted label would be justified, but I don't know enough about the forcepae and what systems it runs on to say for sure. Tainting is done when there is an aspect of the system that could cause the kernel to crash but the cause of the crash is not the kernel code itself. In this case, nobody knows why Intel disabled PAE in the Pentium M - it may be that there are situations where it generates errors, and if that happens then the kernel developers don't want to be bothered with crash reports because it isn't their fault and there is nothing they can do about it.
Sounds reasonable...
Ubuntu Forums Code of Conduct