Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    /dev/root
    Beans
    Hidden!

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Beans
    295

    Re: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

    I made an mini iso of ubuntu 12.04 and 1310 lubuntu and none of them passes the ubuntu logo (install)(install from command line).

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Reykjavík, Ísland
    Beans
    13,647
    Distro
    Xubuntu

    Re: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

    For 13.10 the mini-ISO demands PAE.
    For 12.04 there are two mini-ISO's. Are you sure that you picked the non-PAE one?
    Bringing old hardware back to life. About problems due to upgrading.
    Please visit Quick Links -> Unanswered Posts.
    Don't use this space for a list of your hardware. It only creates false hits in the search engines.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    /dev/root
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

    Quote Originally Posted by frank18 View Post
    I made an mini iso of ubuntu 12.04 and 1310 lubuntu and none of them passes the ubuntu logo (install)(install from command line).
    Forcepae is new and only available in (Trusty to become) 14.04 LTS

    You can use fake-pae with 13.10. See this link

    Lubuntu-fake-PAE

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Beans
    14,769

    Re: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

    Just put the forcepae option after the "--" entry on the installer command line and it will be copied to the target system. The "--" entry defines the boundary between options which are specific to the installer and ones that are copied to the target system.
    -- Colin Watson, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...105/comments/8

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    /dev/root
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

    Quote Originally Posted by Temüjin View Post
    +1

    ... and I have edited a wiki page, that will be linked to the Lubuntu wiki page soon. It can be seen now via Edubuntu

    https://wiki.edubuntu.org/Lubuntu/Ad..._and_Celeron_M

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Beans
    12

    Re: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

    Quote Originally Posted by Temüjin View Post
    Tainted usually means you're running a binary driver, and kernel devs won't accept bug reports. I don't see how that applies here, since the Pentium M's actually support PAE, but don't report it correctly. I guess if the forcepae option works on other CPU's that really don't support PAE, the tainted label would be justified, but I don't know enough about the forcepae and what systems it runs on to say for sure.
    Tainting is done when there is an aspect of the system that could cause the kernel to crash but the cause of the crash is not the kernel code itself. In this case, nobody knows why Intel disabled PAE in the Pentium M - it may be that there are situations where it generates errors, and if that happens then the kernel developers don't want to be bothered with crash reports because it isn't their fault and there is nothing they can do about it.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Reykjavík, Ísland
    Beans
    13,647
    Distro
    Xubuntu

    Re: Xubuntu 12.04 Non PAE

    Sounds reasonable...
    Bringing old hardware back to life. About problems due to upgrading.
    Please visit Quick Links -> Unanswered Posts.
    Don't use this space for a list of your hardware. It only creates false hits in the search engines.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •