Re: Why has Canonical Inc. succeeded where all the others have failed?
Originally Posted by
Dave_L
Canonical has succeeded because it's run by a smart, competent, rich guy who's committed to making it successful.
As several others have mentioned in this thread: it depends what you define as 'success'. To demonstrate perhaps the other side of the coin a distro like Slackware could be seen as successful as well, in terms of committed users, solid and well functioning distro, longevity. It is also run by a smart and competent guy who admittedly is not all that rich and certainly has not been in space .
In the yoga world one would define success completely differently. 'Arogya. Ayus. Atmasakshatkara.' (Good health, a long life and a tranquil mind.) It all depends what you would call success...
You think that's air you're breathing now?
Bookmarks