Originally Posted by
varunendra
Hello Hans,
If this proves to be of any help, I'd love to edit my instructions to use wapf=4 instead of 1, plus the additional recommendation to provide the dmi id here for permanent solution per model. But I would like you to please confirm first how value 4 is better than value 1. Does it enable the Fn+F2 key combo? Is it to make sure that bluetooth works too which you think doesn't work with value '1'? Or is there some other advantage that is going to help you behind the scenes?
I'm asking this because before posting this thread, we had tested the variations 0-9 many times with different users (all the way knowing that officially supported values are 0, 1 and 4, where they respectively mean hardware/hardware, hardware/software and software/software for bluetooth/wireless interfaces), and in all the tests (no less than 4 different machines), anything but 0 made the wireless work, but never enabled the 'Fn+F2' function. Bluetooth was never blocked (as per "rfkill list" output) with any value, if I remember correctly.
So if you are concerned that value 4 is required to ensure bluetooth functionality, I would be curious to know why you think so. Do you have some evidence/feedback that bluetooth is blocked with value 1 and not with 4? I may try to look back at some posts myself if you wish, although I can't guarantee due to lack of time.
So please answer these questions if you have time to -
1) If it doesn't make Fn+F2 work, then why do you want value 4 instead of 1 in the patch?
Bookmarks