Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Beans
    4

    Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    The way I understand it is, Ubuntu takes Debian Sid and updates some packages here and there, making it more up-to-date than Ubuntu. Wouldn't this make Ubuntu less stable than Sid? I do remember having less problems with Sid than I do with Ubuntu.

    I should add that I'm not trying to troll Ubuntu, I love Ubuntu and use it as my main OS.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indiana, United States
    Beans
    734

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Other way around. Debian sid is the testing ground for debian. Stuff get's put there pretty much as soon as it's ready and it eventually trickles down to stable. Ubuntu takes the sid base and freezes it at a certain point of time and makes modifications to make it more stable in theory.
    Whoever came up with the phrase "There is no such thing as a stupid question" obviously never had the internet.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Beans
    277

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Sid is far more unstable.
    Ubuntu while shaky is actually far more stable overall

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Beans
    4

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Quote Originally Posted by mamamia88 View Post
    Other way around. Debian sid is the testing ground for debian. Stuff get's put there pretty much as soon as it's ready and it eventually trickles down to stable. Ubuntu takes the sid base and freezes it at a certain point of time and makes modifications to make it more stable in theory.
    Thanks for clearing that up. I'm having a hard time seeing why anyone would use Debian on the desktop now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indiana, United States
    Beans
    734

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Well I use Debian personally because the stable branch is super duper stable. You can't judge Debian based on sid. Sid exists so that all the bugs can get worked out before the next stable release of Debian.
    Whoever came up with the phrase "There is no such thing as a stupid question" obviously never had the internet.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Beans
    4

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Quote Originally Posted by mamamia88 View Post
    Well I use Debian personally because the stable branch is super duper stable. You can't judge Debian based on sid. Sid exists so that all the bugs can get worked out before the next stable release of Debian.
    Oops. I meant that post to be directed towards Sid and Testing. I used Stable and Sid for a while and liked them both. I can see why someone would use Stable, but Sid seems almost​ pointless.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indiana, United States
    Beans
    734

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paluttoh View Post
    Oops. I meant that post to be directed towards Sid and Testing. I used Stable and Sid for a while and liked them both. I can see why someone would use Stable, but Sid seems almost​ pointless.
    Well yeah it's kinda pointless you really need your system to work but if it's a spare system or something it's nice to be using sid because you always get the latest and greatest and if you find a bug you can report or fix it which is very beneficial to debian development. I hear that sid isn't nearly as bad as people make it out to be and you can actually avoid most game breaking bugs by using a program called apt-listbugs which lists bugs before you accept the updates. I'm personally on wheezy right now because I'm trying to put the whole cutting edge thing behind me. Running alpha software just for fun can be fun on a spare piece of hardware but get's old after awhile on your main pc.
    Whoever came up with the phrase "There is no such thing as a stupid question" obviously never had the internet.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Mystletainn Kick!
    Beans
    4,172
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paluttoh View Post
    Oops. I meant that post to be directed towards Sid and Testing. I used Stable and Sid for a while and liked them both. I can see why someone would use Stable, but Sid seems almost​ pointless.

    Without sid, there would be no testing or stable.
    All packages have to start somewhere, and someone has to try to run it somehow.
    Sure running sid is a crapshoot, and breakage here and there is expected, but life on the bleeding edge of possibly awesome software comes with a price.
    Splat Double Splat Triple Splat
    Earn Your Keep
    Don't mind me, I'm only passing through.
    Once in a blue moon, I'm actually helpful
    .

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Beans
    626
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paluttoh View Post
    Oops. I meant that post to be directed towards Sid and Testing. I used Stable and Sid for a while and liked them both. I can see why someone would use Stable, but Sid seems almost​ pointless.
    Using Sid is a test bed for Linux Developers and other types of Linux Engineers.

    I know a man in Debian Testing and from what I have learned from him is it's intresting to say the least-
    Extreamly challenging is more like it:-
    Last edited by UltimateCat; March 8th, 2013 at 08:46 AM. Reason: Spelling
    "A morning w/o coffee is like something w/o something else"


    Voyager 12.04 Xubuntu based on AMD Phenom Quad Core & CentOS on Sony Vaio


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    OHIO
    Beans
    326
    Distro
    Lubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Judging by the way Ubuntu handles things, Debian Sid should be more stable right?

    I am currently using LMDE/Sid. It is stable, and as someone else pointed out, I also use apt-listbugs before updating.
    however, if you really want "bleeding edge" Debian, go Experimental. that's where all the programs/packages start from before moving up the food chain to Sid, Testing, Stable.

    In the end though, it is to each there own.
    Registered Linux User # 414690
    Registered Ubuntu User # 24355

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •