what were your impressions?
what were your impressions?
Posting this from PC-BSD 9.1 64-bit running in VirtualBox on Ubuntu 12.04. PC-BSD seems to be making strides towards better desktop compatibility. Still some issues with hardware compatibility, so you may want to try a Live-USB image or install a VBox or VMware image unless you have a spare machine to try a bare metal install.
My VM in VBox still has some networking issues (just got networking going) but everything else so far is working as expected. Should be interesting to watch this continue to develop.
Reminder: If you start a thread asking for help with a problem, please remember to use the Thread Tools to mark the issue as "SOLVED" once you have a solution. This will help other people with the same problem when they search for answers.
I've said this before, but I believe that bsd Will die out And eventually merge with linux.
Steam: ubuntugamer( Add me ) | Gaming: Left 4 Dead 2, Metro Last Light, Assassin's Creed 4, Forced
Insofar as "it won't boot" can be considered an impression...
I liked FreeBSD though. Would have been great as a server OS; unfortunately, it didn't last long on my desktop.
I have used it as one of my OSes (along with Xubuntu, Mint, Lubuntu, and Fedora) for the last few years.
It is very stable and very easy to use, but it lacks some hardware support (specifically for AMD video cards and laptops) and software support. It's very usable in a desktop setting with an Nvidia card, but I'm not sure I would recommend it over a more fully featured Linux install at this point. It doesn't offer much that *buntu, Mint, Fedora, Arch, Mageia, OpenSUSE, Sabayon, PCLinuxOS, Debian, or Slackware don't offer in a more mature form.
I wonder if anyone could comment (subjectively) on how it differs from the other BSDs? I'd be interested...
Bookmarks