Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Very POOR FireFox 14.0.1 Performance

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Beans
    12,521

    Re: Very POOR FireFox 14.0.1 Performance

    The other interesting thing to note is that people forget to share the bug number!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC, USA
    Beans
    3,135
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Very POOR FireFox 14.0.1 Performance

    I have to confess, I haven't filed a bug report myself. It's easier just to move from Firefox to Chromium.
    Mac Pro 5,1 6-Core 3.33GHz, 48GB, Sapphire RX580
    Optical -- Apple Super Drive & MCE Internal Blu-ray
    512GB SM 970 Pro NVMe/HighPoint 7101A/10.14.5
    SonnetAllegro Pro USB 3/ 4TB WD/4TB - Barracuda

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Beans
    664

    Re: Very POOR FireFox 14.0.1 Performance

    I have noticed the performance difference between Firefox and Chromium as well, now with Firefox 15.0.1. Firefox seems to require much more from X when scrolling, for example. On the other hand, Firefox respects better window manager's (say xfwm4) settings concerning e.g. raising a window when clicking inside it.

    I use even older, less powerfull hardware: AMD Ahtlon XP without SSE2, NVIDIA Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 420] (rev a3) graphics, so the browser ui responsiveness is important.

  4. #24
    TenPlus1's Avatar
    TenPlus1 is offline Grande Half-n-Half Cinnamon Ubuntu
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Beans
    920
    Distro
    Lubuntu

    Smile Re: Very POOR FireFox 14.0.1 Performance

    I am using Firefox 15 on an old Compaq laptop with intel gfx and it feels smoother and faster than Google Chrome on the same machine... Maybe it's down to gfx drivers and their support, or it could be the fact that I disable web caching and it's all in memory...

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Beans
    664

    Re: Very POOR FireFox 14.0.1 Performance

    I also suspect there is something wrong in X. At least in ubuntu 11.04 on the same hardware even running grsync went unusually slow because X was using so much CPU. I guess displaying progress bar was not implemented optimally in X.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •