Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Bengal, India
    Beans
    92
    Distro
    Kubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Angry Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

    Why the hell the apt command:

    Code:
    sudo apt-get update
    Always eats my precious bandwidth (20-25 MB). I am annoyed because whenever I check for updates or add a third party repository I have to type this command and it just eats...
    Intel Core2Duo 2.20 GHz || 4 GB DDR3 RAM
    nVidia GT 240M 1 GB || 320 GB SATA Hard Disk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Beans
    12,521

    Re: Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravi5kumar View Post
    Why the hell the apt command:

    Code:
    sudo apt-get update
    Always eats my precious bandwidth (20-25 MB). I am annoyed because whenever I check for updates or add a third party repository I have to type this command and it just eats...
    Maybe you have too many sources? And you have ticked source code?

    Go into update manager and maybe you can untick a lot of stuff?

  3. #3
    PaulW2U is offline I Ubuntu, Therefore, I Am
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Beans
    3,110
    Distro
    Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic Beaver

    Re: Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravi5kumar View Post
    Why the hell the apt command:

    Code:
    sudo apt-get update
    Always eats my precious bandwidth (20-25 MB). I am annoyed because whenever I check for updates or add a third party repository I have to type this command and it just eats...
    This has been raised by quite a few users elsewhere and has got worse with the release of Ubuntu 12.04. A bug report has been raised although I can't provide a link to it at present. You are not alone with your concerns.

    You might be able to reduce the download a little though. Do you have any repositories enabled that you don't really need such as Backports, Proposed Updates or Source Code? My download never goes above 17MB.

    Edit: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1001780 is the bug report I was referring to. It's shown as fixed although I still feel a check for updates consumes far more bandwith than it used to.
    Last edited by PaulW2U; August 7th, 2012 at 04:39 PM. Reason: Added link to bug report

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nelspruit, South Africa
    Beans
    1,415
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

    yeah 12.04 update its lots of bandwidth. I have no extra repo
    Monitor: LG flatron w1954s 22", mobo: G31-m7 series, CPU: Intel LGA 775 Intel core duo 2 2,66GHZ, RAM: 3GB, GPU: ATI Radeom HD 2400, Storage: 500GB SATA and 80GB IDE, Windows 7 ultimate and Ubuntu

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Beans
    6,024

    Re: Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

    Yes it got worse with 12.04 and I suspect it's due to multi-arch where you now get i386 & AMD64 stuff.

    Besides that we also need deb-deltas. If this does not happen soon in debian based distros I'm moving to Fedora that offers DeltaRPM. It's not rocket science.

    Unfortunately bandwidth is not cheap in all countries including mine.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Oregon
    Beans
    904

    Re: Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

    Wow. Hate to say this, but glad I don't use Ubuntu, because we constantly go over the bandwidth cap here (it's 150 GB which is pretty generous, but we still go over. 5 family members...) Just to update the repos in Arch uses nowhere near that amount. Although keeping up to date packages probably eats up a lot in a rolling release though...whatever
    Arch x86_64 User / Windows 7 x64 Dual Boot | Nvidia Geforce GT 430 | AMD Phenom II X4 925 (2.8 Ghz, Quad Core) | 6 GB DDR2 RAM | 500 GB HD

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Beans
    6,024

    Re: Checking for updates eats bandwidth..

    Quote Originally Posted by doorknob60 View Post
    Although keeping up to date packages probably eats up a lot in a rolling release though...whatever
    And that is the only reason why I don't use Arch right now. It's still my favourite distro though.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •