Upgrading to a new development cycle: Notes:
The rules remain the same but the speed of information is dynamic and can sometimes often collide. This 15.05 Vivid Vervet Cycle came very quickly, as expected by some, as a continuance of the anticipated rolling release philology.
Also, there is a certain order or 'flowchart' to follow when executing this proceedure. There are several diffirent methods that seem to work well for some and not so well for others. Mistakes will be made and systems will break - but for the most part the rolling releases have been designed to present us testers with somewhat of a fucntioning desktop experience (or a least a working X terminal).
There are basically two main files that have to be edited and updated. The first file is sources.list which can be found here :
Code:
/etc/apt/sources.list
and the Ubuntu.info file which can be found here:
Code:
/usr/share/python-apt/templates/Ubuntu.info
These two files are very different from each other but are essential for the proper update/upgrade to the new development cycle.
When the command:
Code:
sudo sed -i 's/utopic/vivid/g' /etc/apt/sources.list
is executed followed by:
Code:
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
and
Code:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
it will convert the sources.list text to the current repositories for (vivid) but it will also convert the templates in Ubuntu.info to /devel/
This may seem to be very confusing. Back a few cycles ago we were able to use /devel/ verebose to change our sources.list and get updates/upgrades but now it does not seem to work so , in this cycle, it is more prudent to use the first part of the release cycle name. Again , in this case that is /vivid/.
Cariboo907 has detailed the proceedure to insert the new template for the /vivid/ cycle here at this link:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/U%2B1/common...doesn.27t_work
Make sure to append this info at the top of the Ubuntu.info file.
There is a changelog URL. It can either be left in or commented out. Some say it is useful (and probably is) but it still reported errors on one of my installs. Surf the pertinent echos in Ubuntu Development Release and decide for yourselves. Try different things. It's free
Also some will have the proposed repositories turned on. Other would beg to differ to have them disabled. It is most surely if you have them enabled that you will bork your desktop and network , unless, of course , you are an advanced user.
Regards..