Microsoft contributes to Linux Kernel

[Random_Dude]

It occurred to me that it might recur however the occurrence was not so obvious as to assign recurrence status and create this occurrence in the recurring topics.
However having regard to all relevant factors and notwithstanding anything to the contrary if the aforementioned occurrence is a recurrence I will concede and duly assign.

[synaptix]

It occurred to me that it might recur however the occurrence was not so obvious as to assign recurrence status and create this occurrence in the recurring topics.
However having regard to all relevant factors and notwithstanding anything to the contrary if the aforementioned occurrence is a recurrence I will concede and duly assign.

Trying to understand and comprehend this without having brain asplosion...

[Lucradia]

It occurred to me that it might recur however the occurrence was not so obvious as to assign recurrence status and create this occurrence in the recurring topics.
However having regard to all relevant factors and notwithstanding anything to the contrary if the aforementioned occurrence is a recurrence I will concede and duly assign.

Proper grammar below:

It occurred to me that it might be a recurrent [0]; however the occurrence [1] at which I posted this, was not so obvious as to assign recurrence status to it and instead [2] create this occurrence in the recurring topics.
However, having regard to all of the [3] relevant factors and notwithstanding anything to the contrary. If the aforementioned occurrence is a recurrent, I will concede. [4]

[0]: Recur has to be used without an object. You have to use "recurrent" for with an object.

[1]: The word "occurrence" shouldn't actually be used here due to how you are perceiving the post you posted. It should actually be "moment" so that the "at which" that comes after it can be removed. Adding "at which" was needed to keep "occurrence" there.

[2]: Lack of "instead" makes this a strange sounding sentence.

[3]: "Of the" is needed here because you used "to the" before the word contrary.

[4]: "and duly assign" is not needed.

[KiwiNZ]

Proper grammar below:



[0]: Recur has to be used without an object. You have to use "recurrent" for with an object.

[1]: The word "occurrence" shouldn't actually be used here due to how you are perceiving the post you posted. It should actually be "moment" so that the "at which" that comes after it can be removed. Adding "at which" was needed to keep "occurrence" there.

[2]: Lack of a negative makes this a strange sounding sentence.

[3]: "Of the" is needed here because you used "to the" before the word contrary.

[4]: "and duly assign" is not needed.

Say what now

[Lucradia]

Say what now

I actually understood what you said But it was riddled with mistakes, so I fixed it.

[Basher101]

Say what now

my thoughts exactly. I did not understand a thing^^

[KiwiNZ]

I actually understood what you said But it was riddled with mistakes, so I fixed it.

psssttt ......... it was supposed to be

[Lucradia]

psssttt ......... it was supposed to be

Even with the corrections, it would still be hard to understand for an "average" person

[alexfish]

Say what now

Dragons
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0892769/

[MisterGaribaldi]

It occurred to me that it might recur however the occurrence was not so obvious as to assign recurrence status and create this occurrence in the recurring topics.
However having regard to all relevant factors and notwithstanding anything to the contrary if the aforementioned occurrence is a recurrence I will concede and duly assign.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4Dvc1NrZJI

And *that* is all I gotta say about that.