Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: alternatives to adobe flashplayer?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Beans
    1,068
    Distro
    Xubuntu 15.10 Wily Werewolf

    Re: Does anyone version of Flash Work?

    Lightspark is unfortunately useless. It won't play embedded stuff. I seem to able to view most videos on YouTube with HTML5 but nothing embedded. Unless anyone knows a way to get Firefox to use HTML for these?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    UK
    Beans
    17,059
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Does anyone version of Flash Work?

    Have you tried the flashaid mozzila addon to fix up flash.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    England
    Beans
    263
    Distro
    Xubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr

    Re: Does anyone version of Flash Work?

    I think we all know that Flash is on its way out. Adobe are no longer developing it for mobile platforms, iPads don't have it, Windows 8 won't have it.

    Adobe will be giving security updates for the next five years anyway so I'm not worried that I won't be able to watch online videos in a few years time.

    We will know Flash is dead and HTML5 has won when the, er, gentlemen's websites start using it - they always back the winners like VHS and BluRay!
    Last edited by motorcity909; April 9th, 2012 at 08:52 PM. Reason: checking post worked
    AMD Bulldozer FX-4100 Quad Core @ 3.6GHz, NVidia GT430, Asus M5A78L-M LX, 8GB DDR3, Western Digital Green 1TB SATA2 hard-drive

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    USA (Springfield,Vermont)
    Beans
    755
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: alternatives to adobe flashplayer?

    Quote Originally Posted by lovinglinux View Post



    Google promotes tools like FlashVideoReplacer in their own app store.
    Good! Because I'm loving the extension to death!

    And WebM seems to be fine for the majority of videos, hooray!

    I still brought this up, because I noticed some videos failed to come up in WebM mode.
    Last edited by RJARRRPCGP; April 10th, 2012 at 12:21 AM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Brazil
    Beans
    12,497
    Distro
    Ubuntu Studio 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: alternatives to adobe flashplayer?

    Threads merged.


    It seems the only viable alternative in the long term will be to use Chrome browser once they release PepperFlash, because Adobe has ended support for Flash on Linux and handed it to Google. Mozilla and Opera won't implement PepperFlash. Lightspark and Gnash are great initiatives, but sadly don't work. I never was able to make Lightspark work at all and Gnash only works on YouTube as far as I know.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hippiesoldierstan Norwich
    Beans
    2,326
    Distro
    Lubuntu 22.04 Jammy Jellyfish

    Re: Does anyone version of Flash Work?

    Quote Originally Posted by philinux View Post
    Have you tried the flashaid mozzila addon to fix up flash.

    Flash-aid totally fixed all functionality on Firefox [Thank you LL /and Philinux for pointing me there]

    In my case it had to remove Gnash AND Lightspark which i had tried to use as replacement; did not realize they would clash


    SO ALL FUNCTIONALITY RESTORED



    PS ONCE add-on installed one needs to go to the icon and use wizard to complete install, then terminal pops up and shows the changes, very neat.
    Last edited by shantiq; April 10th, 2012 at 11:05 AM.
    Linux is Latin for off-the-beaten-track
    what I like MOST about our Ubuntu ... The Community ie 50 brains are better than one
    Playing with Slackware too now ...
    ShanArt

  7. #27
    TenPlus1's Avatar
    TenPlus1 is offline Grande Half-n-Half Cinnamon Ubuntu
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Beans
    920
    Distro
    Lubuntu

    Smile Re: alternatives to adobe flashplayer?

    In a way I'm happy that flash isn't being developed further on linux with only a few years support for the current version. This will finally give users and sites a chance to upgrade to html5 and use embedded movies like ogg theora, webm and h.264. As for flash games, those could still run using the current version and/or the lightspark project once it's up and running properly...

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Byron, CA, USA
    Beans
    574
    Distro
    Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa

    Post Re: alternatives to adobe flashplayer ???

    Quote Originally Posted by lovinglinux View Post
    ...Unfortunately, I never was able to make Lightspark work. Gnash is functional, but mostly for YouTube. Last time I checked it didn't work on a few sites I needed. It is time for a new series of tests.
    I concur, as Gnash does not interact properly with several user-music and -video Websites, as of April 2012. A test of Gnash that I did at SingSnap® Karaoke back in 2011 was a fail, as Gnash did not upstream data in a format that the Website recognizes, unlike all versions of Adobe® Flash Player; specifically, /karaoke/record/wizard did not recognize any return information from Gnash during an attempted audio calibration.

    W3C Hypertext Markup Language 5 is not a one-for-one replacement for the proprietary Macromedia® shockwave/flash software architecture still required by many user-music and -video Websites, which have to do major recoding for their pages to function properly in HTML 5 as they used to function in Flash.
    Last edited by bcschmerker; April 23rd, 2012 at 02:45 AM. Reason: Fix word-choice error.
    nVIDIA® nForce® chipsets require discrete GPU's up to Pascal and appropriate nVIDIA Kernel modules.
    Most intel® ExpressSets™ and AMD® RS-Series are fully supported in open source.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Beans
    190

    Re: alternatives to adobe flashplayer?

    The last (11.2?) version of flash does work with the latest Ubuntu (11.10), provided you switch off accelerated rendering.

    Adobe struggled to get the accelerated rendering working under Linux for a long time. Some success was achieved via the VPAU feature for those that had nVidia cards, but ATI users got nothing. Now both camps are denied the feature.

    So if you have a powerful enough CPU that can cope with the task of software rendering of the flash video, you will be ok, even for 1080p resolution videos. But for older computers, full screen flash will be unusable, and you will only be able to play embedded videos at around 360/480p.

    So we have a sort of stop gap, especially for those that have powerful CPUs, until an alternative arrives.

    Remember that flash is also used for many on-line games (e.g. runescape), so it will take a while to get those fixed up.
    Last edited by ticket; April 22nd, 2012 at 04:50 PM.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    USA (Springfield,Vermont)
    Beans
    755
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: alternatives to adobe flashplayer?

    Gnash still appears to be an epic fail for anything other than YouTube!

    It can't even play many ads correctly!

    Looks like people may be flocking back to XP, for at least 1 more year.

    Shame on you, Adobe. You make Linux look like a fool and now people may actually go back to Windows XP O_O.
    Last edited by RJARRRPCGP; April 30th, 2012 at 04:30 AM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •