Page 10 of 120 FirstFirst ... 891011122060110 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 1196

Thread: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Beans
    1

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by mikji View Post
    Hi folks,

    I don't really post here that much (long time lurker), but I see you're looking for a moblock gui! Well, I've been working on one in gnome-python for the past few days, and it's about half done.
    Sweet man, that will be invaulable.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Beans
    7

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by pelle.k View Post
    pinoyskull: Are you using breezy? If so, you should install moblock-ipq instead...
    If you are running a kernel > 2.6.15, could you run 'lsmod | grep NFQUEUE'.
    Run 'sudo ls /etc/moblock'. I want to see if all files are there.

    jamesford: I really don't know if it works alongside firestarter. It would be really nice if you (or somebody else) would try this as i have no need for a software firewall (i'm behind a hardware firewall ATM). Let me know, and i'll update my howto.

    bionnaki: MoBlock is actively developed, PG for linux is not. I would say moblock is very easy to handle, and it has a nice and clean structure. You be the judge. I chose MoBlock because almost nothing is happening to PG linux ATM.
    MoBlock has a whitelist at the top of /etc/moblock/MoBlock-nfq.sh. There you can add port 80 (80 which is http is already accepted for outgoing connectiond and their counterpart replys > in.)
    About restarting moblock; it's in the howto, but anyway... 'sudo /etc/init.d/moblock-nfq restart'

    To all of you:
    I've been thinking of writing a GUI for MoBlock using python/ruby, which would handle starting/stopping, updating blocklist, live status and letting people cancel certain ips/ports from the blocklist.
    It would be a tray app of course.
    Moblock works alongside firestarter.
    Moblock has to be started after firestarter for some reason.
    I have to manually restart moblock after I have started Firestarter.
    After that, it seems to work just fine.

  3. #93

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by olnir View Post
    Moblock works alongside firestarter.
    Moblock has to be started after firestarter for some reason.
    I have to manually restart moblock after I have started Firestarter.
    After that, it seems to work just fine.
    Yes, but if you don't find a way to insert moblock at the right place into the firewall (see my previous posts) firestarter is useless except for watching connections.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Beans
    574
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    clessing im having severe problems making an amd64 package, ive never done this before. i dont even know what to do, so i tried as follows and got the following error:
    sudo apt-get source moblock-nfq
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree... Done
    E: Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/moblock-deb.sourceforge.net_debian_dists_unstable_main_sou rce_Sources - open (2 No such file or directory)

    a bit more help would be appreciated
    hardy 64 bit

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Beans
    6

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    My project is started at sf.net/projects/gnome-blocklist. The only thing interesting on there ATM is the svn repo, which you can check as I develop this thing.

    Feel free to send me patches and suggestions, but as of this post it's not in a working state yet. Right now there is a dbus daemon which takes commands from a simple client. That's it.

  6. #96

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesford View Post
    clessing im having severe problems making an amd64 package, ive never done this before. i dont even know what to do, so i tried as follows and got the following error:

    You need
    Code:
    deb http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main
    deb-src http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main
    in /etc/apt/sources.list
    Then do a "apt-get update".
    After that you need to verify that you have all the tools to build the package:
    "apt-get build-dep moblock-ipq" or
    "apt-get build-dep moblock-nfq" depending on the package you want to build.

    If that succeeds you can descend into the source directory:
    These commands should get you towards the goal:

    mkdir moblock
    cd moblock
    apt-get source moblock
    cd moblock-0.8
    dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot

    If everything went right, you should have a .deb file.

    However, you may need to do the same for the packages libnetfilter-queue and libnfnetlink before. These library packages produce two .deb files. You should install the library-package as well as the library-dev packages. (e.g. libnetfilter-queue and libnetfilter-queue-dev)

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Beans
    574
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    clessing, i sucessfully installed the libnetfilter-queue and libnfnetlink thingies

    however with moblock itself:

    Failed to fetch http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net/d....8.orig.tar.gz 404 Not Found
    E: Failed to fetch some archives.

    is some package missing in the repository, or am i doing something wrong?
    hardy 64 bit

  8. #98

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesford View Post
    http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net/d....8.orig.tar.gz 404 Not Found
    E: Failed to fetch some archives.
    Yes, that's really my fault (or that of debarchiver). It was really missing there and it's uploaded now.
    Sorry for the inconvenience.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Beans
    574
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    ah thanks.
    however now i ran into another problem, or maybe its just me, sorry i find this confusing especially since its been a few hours since i managed to set up the files mentioned above

    anyway i get this error:

    make[1]: Entering directory `/home/XXX/moblock/moblock-0.8'
    gcc -DLIBIPQ -Wall -O2 -march=i586 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libipq -c -o MoBlock-ipq.o MoBlock.c
    MoBlock.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set
    MoBlock.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set
    make[1]: *** [MoBlock-ipq.o] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/XXX/moblock/moblock-0.8'
    make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

    btw is this the ipq or nfq version ? or both? how do i choose?
    hardy 64 bit

  10. #100

    Re: Moblock (peerguardian linux alternative)

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesford View Post
    MoBlock.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set

    btw is this the ipq or nfq version ? or both? how do i choose?
    It's the package's fault. I thought that I already had removed the optimization for i586.

    A new package is being uploaded at the moment. You should refetch the source and compile molbock-ipq / moblock-nfq again. Should work now.

    Building the moblock-source from my repository results in both packages. (You will have two .deb files afterwards.)

    Thanks for finding a bug!
    Last edited by clessing; July 15th, 2006 at 08:34 AM.

Page 10 of 120 FirstFirst ... 891011122060110 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •