Originally Posted by hotbrainz
If you make a flash site (especially let's say navigation), you should at least provide an html alternative for users that cannot access/use it.
Originally Posted by hotbrainz
If you make a flash site (especially let's say navigation), you should at least provide an html alternative for users that cannot access/use it.
The idea of copyright did not exist in ancient times, when authors frequently copied other authors at length in works of non-fiction. This practice was useful, and is the only way many authors' works have survived even in part. -- Richard Stallman
I installed it just because it annoyed me not to be able to see what was behind that missing plugin thing.
But.. I start black listing almost every embeded flash content with adblock and flashblock.
I may be sick in the head. One thing that books and paper still have better than the web is that that aren't any pop ups besides the ocasional silverfish.
<a href="http://ubuntucounter.geekosophical.net" title="The Ubuntu Counter Project - user number # 8879"><img src="http://ubuntucounter.geekosophical.net/img/ubuntu-blogger.php?user=8879" alt="The Ubuntu Counter Project - user number # 8879" /></a>
Flash sites are evil and a thing of the past and here's why:Originally Posted by hotbrainz
- You can do almost anything you can do with flash with other, open tools
- Flash is slow
- Flash breaks navigation
- Flash hides content form search engines
- Flash makes c&p impossible
- Flash makes sites inaccessible
- Flash is a closed format, not a standard. Every linux user can feel the effects of this.
Seriously, building flash sites is about the dumbest things one could do, both from a practical, as well as from an ethical, as well as from an economic standpoint.
Like i said before...flash is not for sites like ebay or for any commercial enterprise for that matter, it is not for people who spend serious time over the internet.
It is quite similar to trying to compare documentaries to action movies. Flash sites make sites look good. And as far as alternative HTML is concerned, I provide a basic HTML page to start with which has flash download link and then you get to see the good stuff
End of the day, its all about perspective. You cant remove action movies now from cinemas if they cant be seen in offices now can you. What i mean is your ideas are absolutely true in a business environment but even bling bling and eye candy is big business with the new gen..
People who say Linux is difficult to use are just obsessed by windows ......Close your windows and open your doors to Linux
Ubuntu Starter Guide..RestrictedFormats
Ubuntu Packages...Linux Programs Replacements for Windows Programs...XXamp
Let's just take note that not all web pages are put up just to provide text-based information. Some are solely for entertainment purposes or for audiences that would rather have flashy (no pun intended) designs. In some ways normal HTML/CSS cannot deliver the needed experience.
Just as it is illogical or unnecessary to build a fully flash-based sites to display info such as, for example, technical manuals (imagine if an online man pages version was available, but displayed entirely in flash), it would be equally foolish and tedious to build a site about animation purely using HTML.
While Flash is bulky and at times slow, it does serve its purpose. It just so happens that some (probably most) Linux users have no need for such things that Flash can deliver.
homestarrunner is the example of how to use Flash. It's creative, fun, and non-commercial, but I think it is the exception that proves the rule that Flash is used to push extra content that the viewer doesn't want.
My brother is an experienced web programmer, and he used to say that Flash is poorly documented and poorly implemented. He's happier that he doesn't have to program with it anymore.
Bookmarks