which is the best torrent client

[scouser73]

I recommend Transmission, fast and light and easy to use and configure, also Deluge having used that in the past.

[prohp]

I have transmission 2.2 in my centos server, and i'm able to reach 100Mbps.
Maybe you need to open some ports or change some configuration.

[KegHead]

Hi!

My 2 cents;

BitTorrent has worked for me 2 and 1/2 years faithfully.

KegHead

[sam123]

i am using 'Vuze'. its a nice program with a lot of features and a pleasant UI.
in any torrent client, to get max speed you have to forward your ports properly. have you checked that? if not, visit http://portforward.com/ and follow the instructions

My vote for vuze.

[amn108]

I vote for Transmission. I think the way its developers were able to build a BitTorrent client that is fast, does the job and looks so simple is nothing short of amazing. It has all I need.

[jmszr]

jeshrel,

I use Deluge, but qBittorrent is quite good also.

[smithark]

after seeing all these votes for deluge, qbittorrent, ktorrent and transmission, i am settling back to vuze. i agree with you guys on one point- it is a bloatware. but it is also feature packed. it has password protection (could not find in ktorrent and qbittorrent), ability to move completed files to another folder (could not find in deluge, qbittorrent and transmission), really pleasing GUI (couldnt find in any others)
well, this is just my point of view. for others, the requirements may be different. so, for each guy, the best torrent client will be different. so, choose your client according to your requirements.

oh, and there were no noticeable difference in download speeds. only transmission and ktorrent showed marginal rise in speed (6.83%)

[jeshrel]

how can i access utorrent through wine from ubuntu 10.10 ?

[levancharly]

I have been using Transmission for a while now and it is satisfactory but from the replies I am considering trying Deluge!

[jeshrel]

how do i port forward in ubuntu 10.10