Re: Ubuntu Policy: Don't fix bugs
If there is a bug fix in an application, I'm assuming they have released a new version. Unless that was the only update, it's likely other changes could introduce new bugs. There is a reason they want to keep it "stable".
In terms of security updates, these are necessary so systems are not exploited. Valuable for most any user.
Now, if a specific app has a bug, why on earth would an Ubuntu dev be the one to fix it? Maybe they'd supply a patch, it should be the devs upstream that decide whether or not to apply it. If the bug is due to a maintainer packaging the software improperly (as with the issue I had with libbinio [missing package info or something], installing from source was my resolution to it), they should be responsible for fixing it.
If they just go applying changes instead of taking it upstream, then we would get varying ubuntu versions, duplication of work, possible other problems. I'm not saying they shouldn't submit code to fix it, I'm saying I don't want weird custom versions of various apps.
If you want a newer version of a package, build it or install it. It's as simple as that, use checkinstall and it will be a seamless upgrade too. Done that for scummvm, dosbox, and pan betas (since all of these are out of date in Dapper as is.)
The idea of copyright did not exist in ancient times, when authors frequently copied other authors at length in works of non-fiction. This practice was useful, and is the only way many authors' works have survived even in part. -- Richard Stallman
Bookmarks