Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: GNOME Blog on Canonical, GNOME, and KDE

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Beans
    4,305

    Re: GNOME Blog on Canonical, GNOME, and KDE

    Quote Originally Posted by bruce89 View Post
    The whole thing is a deliberate misrepresentation of GNOME to make them look bad. Perhaps it's designed to bolster support for more forking/improvements like Unity.
    I doubt that. I do not see some of the folks that work at Canonical staying if they have intentions like that.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Wasteland
    Beans
    328
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: GNOME Blog on Canonical, GNOME, and KDE

    Figured I'd pitch in my two cents. Really, focusing on the positives here: at the very least, both sides (Canonical and Gnome) have developed their own polished products that can compete side-by-side. Really, it's actually kind of an exciting time to be an end user when you think about it.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Beans
    340
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: GNOME Blog on Canonical, GNOME, and KDE

    Quote Originally Posted by DeadSuperHero View Post
    Figured I'd pitch in my two cents. Really, focusing on the positives here: at the very least, both sides (Canonical and Gnome) have developed their own polished products that can compete side-by-side. Really, it's actually kind of an exciting time to be an end user when you think about it.
    Especially if someone manages to force through some standards that will make life on a Linux desktop easier. (and I think that Canonical is in an excellent position to do this)
    The above post definitely does not contain any sarcasm at all.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dominican Republic
    Beans
    47
    Distro
    Kubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat

    Re: GNOME Blog on Canonical, GNOME, and KDE

    Quote Originally Posted by oldos2er View Post
    NO! No, we don't want them to start "improving" KDE....
    +1

    if KDE gets "unityzed" i'll stick to XFCE, if XFCE follows suit i'll move to enlightenment, if enlightenment folds to the "unity paradigm", i'll protect myself with some *box and, if all else fails, i'll hopefully would've learned enough by then to write my own desktop enviroment that doesn't try to "revolutionize" my desktop "experience" and just let me use my computer in peace like Babbage intended[1]...

    1: Charles Babbage is considered "father of the computer" for those that might not get the reference.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Beans
    2,179
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal

    Re: GNOME Blog on Canonical, GNOME, and KDE

    Quote Originally Posted by GabrielYYZ View Post
    +1

    if KDE gets "unityzed" i'll stick to XFCE, if XFCE follows suit i'll move to enlightenment, if enlightenment folds to the "unity paradigm", i'll protect myself with some *box and, if all else fails, i'll hopefully would've learned enough by then to write my own desktop enviroment that doesn't try to "revolutionize" my desktop "experience" and just let me use my computer in peace like Babbage intended[1]...

    1: Charles Babbage is considered "father of the computer" for those that might not get the reference.
    Or if it's like GNOME you could just disable it and use the default UI of the DE...
    If the only reason you think your software is better is because it's FOSS, you need to write better software

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Beans
    21
    Distro
    Xubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope

    Re: GNOME Blog on Canonical, GNOME, and KDE

    Quote Originally Posted by GabrielYYZ View Post
    +1

    if KDE gets "unityzed" i'll stick to XFCE, if XFCE follows suit i'll move to enlightenment, if enlightenment folds to the "unity paradigm", i'll protect myself with some *box and, if all else fails, i'll hopefully would've learned enough by then to write my own desktop enviroment that doesn't try to "revolutionize" my desktop "experience" and just let me use my computer in peace like Babbage intended[1]...

    1: Charles Babbage is considered "father of the computer" for those that might not get the reference.
    And will you write it in Ada?[2]

    2: Ada is a programming language named after Ada Lovelace (1815–1852) who is often credited as being the first computer programmer based on her writings about Babbage's differential engine.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •