Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Why people on Linux related forums under-estimate hardware

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Beans
    4,305

    Re: Why people on Linux related forums under-estimate hardware

    It could probably handle any task but hd multimedia or 3d games, so I do not see the problems. ;/

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Paraparaumu, New Zealand
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Why people on Linux related forums under-estimate hardware

    Quote Originally Posted by barbedsaber View Post
    I was running ubuntu on my 1.6ghz atom netbook.

    it tested my patience
    less than windows would have, but still...
    That's nothing: the machine I mentioned here, which flies along at a whopping 133 MHz, tested my patience while finding a flavour of Ubuntu that would actually install, let alone work. That's right, 133 megahertz!
    Forum DOs and DON'Ts
    Please use CODE tags
    Including your email address in a post is not recommended
    My Blog

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Why people on Linux related forums under-estimate hardware

    Quote Originally Posted by NightwishFan View Post
    If I can get them satisfactory enough, I will probably install Debian XFCE on them and donate.
    If possible, get 256mb ram for Debian. I have done much testing on older hardware with various distros, and can tell you that debian will run on 128, but it will be pretty slow, even with a minimal install. The best distros I've tried on 128 or less is Tiny Core Linux, followed by Slitaz.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Beans
    4,305

    Re: Why people on Linux related forums under-estimate hardware

    Yeah a full gnome desktop is not very fun on 256mb but it works. (Doing so right now).
    Code:
     free -m
                 total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:           245        241          3          0          2         59
    -/+ buffers/cache:        179         65
    Swap:         2859        225       2634
    Granted I am on 64-bit and have a lot of stuff running (evolution, totem, banshee, and firefox)

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Adelaide Australia
    Beans
    463
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Why people on Linux related forums under-estimate hardware

    It really depends on how you use your computer

    Personally, I have some 50gb of music that a program has to keep track of and search through all the time, I don't remember the last time I had less than 6 tabs open in chrome (and before I had FF with some 6 quintillion addons), I watch HD movies, and use fullscreen HD flash content. I have a torrent client keeping track of some 200 torrents 24/7, and I mash alt-tab like a madman between my half a dozen programs that I'm flogging at any one time.

    Some people browse one tab at a time, don't listen to music, or have smaller collections, don't watch movies, and really just work with documents.

    Good thing about linux is there's a solution for both of those people.
    blog ~~~ last.fm ~~~ twitter ~~~ digg
    Just so you know, everywhere else on the internet, I am known as mynameistux
    Its just a bunch of 1's and 0's.

  6. #36

    Re: Why people on Linux related forums under-estimate hardware

    I suppose I should weigh in. I run Debian Squeeze at 120Mhz / 80Mb, Crux at 150 Mhz / 32Mb and Debian Lenny at 133Mhz / 32Mb. The trick isn't getting the machine to run the software, it's to get your perspective in line with how best use Linux at low speeds.
    Ubuntu user #7247 :: Linux user #409907
    inconsolation.wordpress.com

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •