Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 74

Thread: FOSS Licensing

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Beans
    927
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    FOSS Licensing

    For all you programmers and artists out there - what license(s) do you use, and why?

    Personally I always put my work in the Public Domain.
    Last edited by Penguin Guy; June 26th, 2010 at 02:47 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    Public Domain:
    Hopefully a big company like Windows or Mac will use your work (meaning a cheaper/better OS for end-customers)
    Companies rarely pass savings to their customers. They prefer to keep their prices high and increase profit margin, instead of cutting prices due to smaller development cost.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Death Star IV
    Beans
    492
    Distro
    Kubuntu

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    GPL, apple and microsoft shall not touch my work
    I had to do it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tuxland
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    I've used MIT, Apache, and GPL in the past. I prefer GPL but I will contribute to any project worthwhile on the license their original authors have chosen without any issue.
    Proud GNU/Linux zealot and lover of penguins
    "Value your freedom or you will lose it, teaches history." --Richard Stallman

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Beans
    96

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    Quote Originally Posted by Penguin Guy View Post
    For all you programmers and artists out there - what license(s) do you use, and why? Also, what do you think about the below notes?

    • Public Domain:
      • Actual freedom
      • Hopefully a big company like Windows or Mac will use your work (meaning a cheaper/better OS for end-customers)

    • GPL:
      • Big companies won't profit from your work
      • Big companies will be forced, by the GPL, to contribute code


    I plan on adding more to this list a later date. I'll also try to keep it updated with other peoples opinions.
    Wrong. Big companies do profit from GPL code and are not forced to contribute code, so your notes are bollocks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    California Republic
    Beans
    2,657

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    you know Red Hat is a fortune 500 company, right?

    and IBM?

    you would be correct in stating that the business model for Free Software isn't exactly the same as Microsoft's model, but it's certainly viable.

    Keep in mind also that Linus Torvalds is a multi millionaire.
    Semper Fi

    My Non-Ubuntu Blog.
    All posts by me are Public Domain.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Beans
    146
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    Quote Originally Posted by Penguin Guy View Post
    what do you think about the below notes?
    BSD trolled.
    Quote Originally Posted by Pimientito
    NEVER EVER give a gypsy player an unprotected guitar to play. It will end in tears!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Beans
    927
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    Quote Originally Posted by mickie.kext View Post
    Companies rarely pass savings to their customers. They prefer to keep their prices high and increase profit margin, instead of cutting prices due to smaller development cost.
    But Microsoft are forced to cut prices a little due to competition, especially so when their monopoly ends.

    Quote Originally Posted by splicerr View Post
    Wrong. Big companies do profit from GPL code and are not forced to contribute code, so your notes are bollocks.
    Okay, I'll just remove that one then.
    Last edited by Penguin Guy; June 26th, 2010 at 11:32 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Beans
    162
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    What GPL does differently from other less restrictive FOSS licenses is that it discourages forks. If a company takes a project and spins it off without contributing back (i.e. non-GPL license) then community improvements would have to be merged back at the expense of the company, or not at all. A smart company will find a business model that works under those restrictions and use them to its advantage.

    At my previous job we used a fork of Apache 1.3.26 as a basis for one of our products. You don't want to know what a security scanner would do with that... What this meant was a constant backporting effort which would consume a huge amount of resources. It took us five years to migrate to Apache 2, and all we had added was a custom access module!

    At my current job, I am managing a product which is basically based off a major FOSS project. This time around, we do contribute back. I will actually be seeking managerial approval to open our resources (build farm, test farm, etc.) to all contributors. It's not FOSS zealotry, but pure business sense. With a proper CI framework in place, commits won't be pushed upstream unless they pass all automation tests. This way, we can focus on the parts that are important to us, and the community can do whatever they feel is important to them, but working on the same trunk and constantly testing it would ensure that we won't be stepping on each other's toes. It's a win-win.

    Unfortunately, most companies can't just use GPL FOSS as-is because, with a few notable exceptions, it's not tailored for enterprise needs. If they have to add their own IP to make it work for them but have to share it with everyone else, it can easily be seen as a poor business strategy.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Beans
    73
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: FOSS Licensing

    Quote Originally Posted by Penguin Guy View Post
    [LIST][*]GPL:
    • Big companies will be forced, by the GPL, to contribute code
    ...not

    GPL offer different layer of usability of the source code. What big companies can't do is hide (compile) other's GPL source code and act (steal) as the code was developed by them.
    What if someday login in your facebook account you're required to accept yet-another-update license agreement saying you're a total idiot? Quit Facebook, join Diaspora*
    my webcomics ~ my diasp*

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •