Yah, I still use my 250 megabyte drive. But in 9.10 it stopped wanting to mount. I need an answer sort of fast. Any ideas?
Yah, I still use my 250 megabyte drive. But in 9.10 it stopped wanting to mount. I need an answer sort of fast. Any ideas?
Nothing happens when I put a disk in, what's "dmesg"?
Got Something -
Code:[ 2418.848498] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 07 77 80 00 00 08 00 [ 2418.848527] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 489344 [ 2418.848540] Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 122336 [ 2418.848549] Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 122337 [ 2644.420063] usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 5 [ 2644.588540] usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 2644.607638] scsi7 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices [ 2644.612713] usb-storage: device found at 5 [ 2644.612717] usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning [ 2649.613389] usb-storage: device scan complete [ 2649.617382] scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Access IOMEGA ZIP 250 90.V PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 CCS [ 2649.623191] sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
Second command returned this -
Code:mount: special device /dev/sg2 does not exist
Sorry, yes sg2 is wrong it should be sdb1. But this probably still wont work from the looks of your dmesg output. try:
Then see what dmesg shows. There should be a lines something like:Code:sudo modprobe usb-storage
[ 2649.623191] sdb: sdb1
[ 2649.623191] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdb] Direct-Access IOMEGA ZIP 250 90.V PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 CCS
[ 2649.623191] sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
In which case "sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/zip" should work. But I'm a bit worried by the errors:
Which suggest there may be a problem with your disk.[ 2418.848527] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 489344
[ 2418.848540] Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 122336
[ 2418.848549] Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 122337
H
I will try this later today, but I put in my 8.10 cd and ran it live, and it couldn't find the zip. The formatting may be not right, what would be the best format?
I would have thought it would be best to keep to DOS/VFAT format which is how the disks come formatted originally (or HFS for use with MACs). If you think you'll ever want to use it with a Windows computer that's the only choice. Of course they can be formatted ext2 and probably other ways also.
H
Bookmarks