Who decides this? Sounds like the much loathed 'app store' guidelines, with the key difference that it is the distro's that check the software for updates and then update the repo. Once this list has accumulated potentially millions of items you'll need rooms with hundreds of people who's sole job is to check if something has been updated and then put it in the repo. It simply won't work.
Expecting developers to submit it to the repo won't work either as every distro has it's own, requiring a software developer to repeatedly package and distribute their work to dozens of platforms - something they commonly won't be willing to do.
It's not legal? You still need permission to distribute no-cost closed source software most of the time. Also it'd be entirely unverified, effectively losing the security-through-limited-choice system you have now.b: Why not?
I don't know whether it is the hardware drivers that are giving problem. A lot of hardware does support Window XP unless it is service pack 3 you are installing. Especially the audio HD drivers. But once you get the network card install I think you can download most of the drivers from the internet. Lastly you have 4 years to go until they totally stop supporting the Window XP. So enjoy it while you can. If not go for Window 7.
The only thing that is really annoying about installing Windows XP is the lack of support for things like SATA (and if you want to be very modern, usb installation of drivers etc)
I wouldn't let my mother try her hand at it, but then again, with partitioning a standard part of the process, I wouldn't let my mother install Ubuntu as well.
I have installed 3.1, XP, Vista and 7, and have to say that where Vista was a very strange experience, 7 works great and that is in part because it's back to the no-options-no-frills simplicity of XP. Now, for me...the nerd...that's exactly what I hate, but I think it suits most.
Then again, I've never got what everybody's problem is with the whole "Installation Experience" I didn't have any problems with Warty of Hoary, and I didn't have any with Lucid.
"All of your base are belong to us!"
Installing any OS from scratch can be a pain depending on your hardware, installing an old OS on new hardware is not going to be an easy ride, any OS which outdates the hardware it is being installed on is unlikely to have drivers for hardware which didn't exist when the OS was made.
Go out, do stuff
That's true. Kubuntu can be installed and configured even by a child, but also XP is quite as much as easy to install.
I find Windows 7's installer even simplier to be honest, apart from the fact it's slow as hell and I don't know why.
The main difference is that once done the install, setting up the system in Linux is just a series of apt-get calls, while setting up Windows to be fully functional requires drivers, software (even the basics like an office suite or burning software) and various additional things.
Spot on. If you install XP SP2 on a 5-years-old machine it will probably auto-recognize a good 2/3 of the hardware. Try installing it on a brand new machine and you'll struggle a lot more.
it's sad to say, but XP has got old.
Last edited by julio_cortez; May 19th, 2010 at 11:36 AM.
I'm a human, so I can make mistakes. Therefore this post (which represents my view) may be mistaken or contain errors.
Oh, by the way, it may also feature some sarcasm. So take it easy.
Installing Windows is easy. Installing non-included drivers in Windows is alot easier than doing it in Linux. Just double clicking an icon is pretty simple compared to messing around with config files or the linux kernel.
Bookmarks