Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Amarok vs Listen vs Rhythmbox System Loads

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Beans
    2,526

    Amarok vs Listen vs Rhythmbox System Loads

    I thought I would share something I just found out.

    System is AMD64 Turion X2 32 bit OS 9.10 with 3 GB RAM

    I decided to give Listen a try and noticed that the system load monitor was around 2/3 to 3/4. I didn't think to check the % of load until I started writing this but I did a comparison against Amarok and Rhythmbox.

    I let the system sit with nothing else running, it's about 82 F right now and I played the same song (Dido - Honestly Ok) in each player. Also I let it cool down to idle temps. before starting the next player and waited until about 3:15 into the song to take the screen shots.

    Here are the temps. all in Celsius.
    Amarok
    GPU = 67
    CPU Core 1 = 46
    CPU Core 2 = 46
    HD Temp. = 46

    Listen
    GPU = 79
    CPU Core 1 = 64
    CPU Core 2 = 64
    HD Temp. = 46

    Rhythmbox
    GPU = 63
    CPU Core 1 = 43
    CPU Core 2 = 43
    HD Temp. = 46

    None
    GPU = 59
    CPU Core 1 = 39
    CPU Core 2 = 39
    HD Temp. = 42

    The sensors and system monitor screen clips are attached.
    Left to right - Amarok - Listen - Rhythmbox - None
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by 2hot6ft2; March 31st, 2010 at 11:30 PM.
    Ultimate Edition Links

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •