Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Where I am
    Beans
    807
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    It uses a lot of system resources, as said before. Honestly, it's just really a pain to use.
    .i coi rodo

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Leicester, UK
    Beans
    95
    Distro
    Ubuntu Studio 9.10 Karmic Koala

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grenage View Post
    Well as long as it's fine on your machine, there is obviously no problem.
    Haha, quote of the day

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vermont, USA
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerd King View Post
    Adobe don't know how to make efficient and secure code. That's a problem for all of us.
    I wouldn't necessarily say that; it's more that they don't feel like spending the money to do so.
    Sam
    Computer: System76 Pangolin Performance

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Georgia Tech, Atlanta
    Beans
    5
    Distro
    Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    My friend calls it 'Flush', because of its closed source nature.

    I am just a normal user and what I don't like is that more often than not I experience crashes because of badly written flash apps. That should not be allowed to happen.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bullet Hell
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    1. It's not open source.
    2. It has consumed 50-60 percent of my CPU.
    3. It flickers.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Beans
    47

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    It's a buggy resource hog that doesn't support my keyboard shortcuts for navigation in Vimperator. I quite like it for video, but that's only because embedded ogg hasn't caught on yet.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tuxland
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    I think most of the problems can be summed up as thus:

    NO HARDWARE ACCELERATION
    (not even through Xv)

    Combine "no hardware acceleration" with "H.264 decoding" (not well known for it's computational efficiency), and you have a recipe for fail.
    Proud GNU/Linux zealot and lover of penguins
    "Value your freedom or you will lose it, teaches history." --Richard Stallman

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portsmouth, UK
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    Full HD video works fine on one of my laptops, yet flash does not. Conclusion - Flash client sucks.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Beans
    4,628
    Distro
    Kubuntu 18.10 Cosmic Cuttlefish

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    Because it sucks in every way possible.

    • Eats CPUs
    • Misused
    • Buggy
    • There always seems to be a new exploit found in it
    • No hardware acceleration
    • Poor Linux version (I've even heard it's not too great on OS X either)
    Blog | Ubuntu User #15350 | Zsh FTW | Ubuntu Security | Nothing to hide?
    AMD Phenom II X6 1075T @ 3GHz, Nvidia GTX 650, 8GB DDR3 RAM, 1 X 1TB, 2 X 3TB HDD
    Please don't request support via PM


  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Beans
    47

    Re: Flash, and why is there some much anger about it?

    Quote Originally Posted by FuturePilot View Post
    Because it sucks in every way possible.

    • Eats CPUs
    • Misused
    • Buggy
    • There always seems to be a new exploit found in it
    • No hardware acceleration
    • Poor Linux version (I've even heard it's not too great on OS X either)
    Yup, that about sums it up. Out of all the issus you identified though, I think its misuse is probably the one that bothers me the most. Flash interfaces are uniformly horrible when it comes to content navigation, and I'll often avoid visiting official sites for companies/movies/games, etc. that I want to find information for because I know that I'll probably have to suffer through all sorts of Flash nonsense. Plenty of other web technologies is similarly abused when, in most cases, plain 'ole HTML would do the job just fine, but Flash is easily the most obtrusive and obnoxious of the lot.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •