Re: Anti-virus
Of course, the 2nd option presents a huge conflict of interest. If a new virus is discovered that exploits a technical flaw, do they fix the flaw first, or release an update to their antivirus? I would not put it past Microsoft to do this as an incentive for more users to buy their protection.
I don't think it has to be an either/or type of deal. It's much easier (and faster) to release a signature file that will stop the virus than it is to code a patch. So the first thing out will be a signature of the virus to stop it's spread while the patch is being created. It's not a bad idea especially since the update mechanisms are already in place making it easier for users. You got MS Update now that will update all of the MS software on your system at the same time (or so they say). I can also see an A/V from MS to be faster than 3rd party ones since they know the OS inside out.
Since I get asked alot, I am originally from Ukraine but am Russian by nationality. My nick means specter in Russian.
Bookmarks