Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Browser Wars

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Beans
    369
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Browser Wars

    If anyone wanted to know the daily builds of Google Chrome for Linux, and OSX are stable, fast, and almost feature complete. Major things like Flash work great. The GTK+ integration works great.


    I'm sticking with this as my default browser.

    here is the link

    http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Beans
    5,638
    Distro
    Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala

    Re: Browser Wars

    Do you know if it has an equivalent to Xmark (for firefox)?
    To err is human, to forgive is very ... dog-like.

    Thomas Aaron
    FetchMasters, LLC

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Beans
    369
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Browser Wars

    http://blog.xmarks.com/?p=1244

    Third party extension support is one of those "not feature complete" things.

    But xmarks in Chrome seems to be in Alpha dev right now.

    I can see how this might be a deal breaker for some. Especially those of us that browse the web at work, and want our bookmarks to appear on our browsers at home....you would think this functionality would be built into Chrome as Google is all about the cloud.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Beans
    569
    Distro
    Lubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail

    Re: Browser Wars

    Speaking of browsers, I just upgraded to Epiphany 2.28.1 & noticed I couldn't open a pdf by clicking on it.
    It turns out they switched from using the Mozilla engine to using Webkit.
    I'm hoping that future updates will bring all the functionality back.

    jdb

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Conn., United States
    Beans
    1,644

    Re: Browser Wars

    With Chrome's EULA (http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/eula_text.html) I could never switch to it. I only agree to restrictive license terms when there is no other option (example: Google Earth).

    Are there really any benefits to using Chrome that would outweigh having to agree to such licensing terms? I'm really not a GPL purist, and I value usability (getting my work done) over the FSF philosophy. But, having said that, there really does need to be some "killer" functionality before I would consider giving up my rights as defined by the FSF.

    Having said that, I understand that there is an open-source version of Chrome (Chromium). Is this the version of Google Chrome that you are talking about? Is there any advantage to using it over Firefox?
    "When you dual-boot Windows, Windows exists along side of Linux. When you use VirtualBox, Windows exists at the pleasure of Linux." -- ThomasAaron @ System76

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Beans
    369
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Browser Wars

    Chromium is the only version available for Linux, and OSX. It's 100% open source.

    Here is the list of different licences it has, with the bulk being the BSD licence



    http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Conn., United States
    Beans
    1,644

    Re: Browser Wars

    Quote Originally Posted by Lee_Machine View Post
    Chromium is the only version available for Linux, and OSX. It's 100% open source.

    Here is the list of different licences it has, with the bulk being the BSD licence

    http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html
    In the words of the famous philosopher, Emily Litella: "Nevermind."

    "When you dual-boot Windows, Windows exists along side of Linux. When you use VirtualBox, Windows exists at the pleasure of Linux." -- ThomasAaron @ System76

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •