I guess that as such a big company you either fully support something or you don't.
Are they providing ports or just selling games or what are they doing? It's not really clear from the page.
What other big developers have provided linux clients for most of their games?
The squirrels are mad about this... I think this could be what spawned the invasion.
first epic games, now id... and this while our user numbers has grown.
Something's fishy here.
EA is publishing Rage and that means you better forget about support completely. Same goes for most other games EA is involved in.
From Wikipedia:
I'm not even sure if it's wikipedia vandalism, because it's so close to the truth."Fail" redirects here. For Epic Fail, see EA Sports. For other uses, see Fail (disambiguation).
Electronic Arts (EA) (NASDAQ: ERTS) is a company that is based around fail and spreading it like cancer.
I hope that with the new kms,ttm,gem,gallium3d and the radeonhd drier, the porting of 3d engines to linux will be much more generalized/easier. Also even on windows the 3d engines can only perform well on nvidia and amd 3d hw.
Hate to say it, but I agree with your attitude toward this. Every time I try to convince people to use Linux, they state that the lack of games keeps them in windows (and sadly, myself as well. I have a "windows console" for playing games and only games.) Wine just doesn't cut it most of the time.
Carmack has always been pretty egotistical if you ask me. The success of his games has only made it worse. The part that saddens me is that he's turned more publisher than developer. He lost that "develop to prove it can be done" attitude and gained the "bottom line matters most" attitude.
Bookmarks