[QUOTE=celticbhoy;7362735]NoWhat's so bad about it?/QUOTE]
What is upsetting a lot of people is that Canaonical are a commercial company and they will be charging for those who wish more than the 2G free storage amount. As this is a commercial undertaking a lot of people think that the name should not be directly associated with Ubuntu a free open source project, and as such should not be on the Ubuntu forums.
The majority of the people are ok with canonical making making with this software.
Heck the more money they make the better for us.
And canonical does make money from ubuntu from OEMS.
let us be clear what is upsetting people is that this is CLOSED SOURCE.
the client being open source is of no use without the server.i cant do anything with only the client right now.
So just make It FOSS and then people will gladly even pay for the premium versions.
ubuntu is free software, so ubuntu one should either be renamed and canonical should not integrate it by default else open it up.