Re: Problem with the new "Star Trek" movie SPOILER WARNING
Originally Posted by
Corelogik
Spock traveled back in time, Spock prime remembered the original time line. So the original timeline existed. The moment Nero came back in time and encountered the USS Kelvin, the original timeline ceased to exist.
Star Trek is canon. So say the creators. They have reset the timeline for themselves in order to open up a new, unrestricted playground for new movies and series'.
YMMV
No, Spock' causes Picard' causes Cochran' causes Archer' causes Spock'' causes Picard'' causes Cochran'' causes Archer'' causes Spock''' and so on. I didn't know the creator, Eugene Wesley "Gene" Roddenberry (August 19, 1921 – October 24, 1991), died in 1991 according to wikipedia, said or could say anything on the matter.
Or do you mean the ones who created this movie for $$$ and destroyed everything the actual creator did?
Originally Posted by
EDavidBurg
Wait. So you're telling me that a science fiction movie was inconsistent in its treatment of time travel? Holy cow!
And a lot of movies are temporally accurate. The Back to the Future Trilogy is, except when Doc Brown sends him back to 1885, he should have known he would wind up in 1885 throughout the second and any part of the first movie after 1955. That means his line in 1885 "Who dressed you like that?" he should remember the 1955 him dressed Marty like that. That is the only issue.
Originally Posted by
Magnes
Yeah. It was quite a stupid movie. The "old timeline" though is intact, the new one is now an alternative world like the one we know from other episodes of Star Trek but different.
I don't like the new Star Trek. New version of Doctor Who has been done much much better (sorry for my English, I feel that this sentence is wrong, but don't know how to improve it).
Yes, the only fix they can do is in the next movie they can say "The red matter must have split us into an entirely different tangent dimension, running alongside what actually would have happened."
And your English in that line is fine, the only thing you missed was it should be "The new version..." not just "New version..." but that doesn't matter. When speaking I've used similar to "New version..." but usually when typing I do say "The new version..."
Last edited by bobbob1016; May 25th, 2009 at 02:23 PM.
"Look, maybe I didn't say every single little tiny syllable, no. But basically I said them, yeah." - Ash J Williams
That works as well as not following every step in a tutorial or walkthrough.
Bookmarks