can anyone please put some light on VMware server and player.. what is the difference or which is better???
or should i go with virtual box????
(i won't pay for VMware.....vbox is free)
can anyone please put some light on VMware server and player.. what is the difference or which is better???
or should i go with virtual box????
(i won't pay for VMware.....vbox is free)
My 0.02
I use VMWare Server 2.0. You don't have to pay for it...just register it to get a serial number.
It works well for me. I could never get Virtualbox to work for me, but in all fairness, I didn't spend a lot of time with it. It's all what you are used to. I got used to VMWare Server, and it works well for me.
The only issue I ever have is I have to re-run the installer script after a kernel update. YMMV
PK
If you have the hardware, go for KVM.
Otherwise, IMO, VMWare server 1.x is more stable and, again, IMO, has more userful fearures then 2.x. Player is a bit light weight and some people prefer it for that reason. With server you can make a new appliance.
Virutalbox is also an option.
There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth...not going all the way, and not starting.
--Prince Gautama Siddharta
#ubuntuforums web interface
Bookmarks