My concern is this is not something that is particular to the systems listed, but may be more general for specific CPUs or kernel versions. Perhaps some other members will chime in with reports of support for their quad core CPUs.
My concern is this is not something that is particular to the systems listed, but may be more general for specific CPUs or kernel versions. Perhaps some other members will chime in with reports of support for their quad core CPUs.
Last edited by blueridgedog; February 8th, 2009 at 09:28 PM.
Finding Linux Applications | Solve Black Screen on Boot | How to Share files with your windows computers | Linux ate my Ram | Ubuntu is Not Debian | Please post support questions, don't send them as private messages
Moved to hardware (thanks blueridgedog )
| My old and mostly abandoned blog |
Linux user #413984 ; Ubuntu user #178
J'aime les fraises.
Nighty night me lovelies!
| Reinstalling Ubuntu ? Please check this bug first ! |
| Using a ppa ? Please install ppa-purge from universe, you may need it should you want to revert packages back |
| No support requests / username changes by PM, thanks. |[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I tried booting with noapic and then with acpi=off at the end of the kernel line, but it did not make a difference.
This is the output of dmesg | grep -i cpu:Could the line that says "SMP: Allowing 1 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs" have anything to do with the problem?Code:[ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [ 0.000000] SMP: Allowing 1 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs [ 0.000000] PERCPU: Allocating 41628 bytes of per cpu data [ 0.000000] NR_CPUS: 64, nr_cpu_ids: 1, nr_node_ids 1 [ 0.000000] Initializing CPU#0 [ 0.004000] SLUB: Genslabs=12, HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1 [ 0.004189] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [ 0.004202] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K [ 0.004205] CPU: L2 cache: 4096K [ 0.004207] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 0.004208] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 0.024039] weird, boot CPU (#0) not listedby the BIOS. [ 0.132067] Brought up 1 CPUs [ 0.132078] CPU0 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.132080] domain 0: span 0 level CPU [ 1.116669] cpuidle: using governor ladder [ 1.116671] cpuidle: using governor menu
Perhaps it is certain Bios(es) and certain CPU's that the kernal has trouble with?
Finding Linux Applications | Solve Black Screen on Boot | How to Share files with your windows computers | Linux ate my Ram | Ubuntu is Not Debian | Please post support questions, don't send them as private messages
I agree with blueridgedog. Please run
and attach lshw.bz2 to a post so we'll know the make/model of your machine, motherboard, bios, and cpus.Code:sudo lshw | bzip2 -c > lshw.bz2
Googling any of those keywords along with "SMP Allowing 1 CPUs" or "weird, boot CPU (#0) not listedby the BIOS" might also be useful.
In that case I'd expect it to be consistent, that it would either recognize or fail to recognize all four of my cores 100% of the time. For me at least, I'm guessing that it fails to recognize all four cores about 85% of the time. Right now, I'm in a boot that sees all four cores. If I reboot, I suspect only one core will come up.
Sorry to disturb, but I noticed exactly same behavior on my AMD quad-core processor this was my original question:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1060923
but as I did some of those first steps in this section, I noticed also that it gives just one cpu. but one thing also as I noticed while doing renderings and following the system from Htop if I stopped and continued it took core 3 instead of the core 4
For what it's worth, here is a testimonial that the Core 2 Quad Q6600 processor is compatible with Ubuntu 8.10 (both 32- and 64-bit):
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ub...ry/170329.html
One has to wonder if the author of that post actually verified that all four cores were running rather than the system working. I am ordering a quad core this week, so soon I will have another statistic to add to the issue.
Finding Linux Applications | Solve Black Screen on Boot | How to Share files with your windows computers | Linux ate my Ram | Ubuntu is Not Debian | Please post support questions, don't send them as private messages
The output of "sudo lshw | bzip2 -c > lshw.bz2" is attached to this post.
Does ubuntu 8.10 use the 386 or 686 kernel? I've read that 686 is better for Intel processors. Is this true?
Bookmarks