This might make you rethink using "noop"... the other good ssd option is "deadline".
noop vs deadline
My Mushkin 40GB SSD in my Lenovo netbook with "EXT4, noatime, discard and /tmp mounted to tmpfs" gives me:
Using "deadline" -
buffered 548MB in 3.01 = 182.71 MB/sec
cached 1518MB in 2.00 = 759.52 MB/sec
Using "noop" -
buffered 552MB in 3.01 = 183.14 MB/sec
cached 1492MB in 2.00 = 746.73 MB/sec
Not much of a difference either way. A <1MB buffered adv to noop and 13MB cached adv to deadline. What does a netbook do more of "buffered" or "cached" reading? Not sure I really know the diff. So for now I'm leaving it on deadline which is what it's been since the install of the SSD.
I'll be replacing my SATA-I 74GB 10K WD boot drive next week with an OCZ Vertex 2 64MB so I'll have to run these on that and see the diff.
Bookmarks