I'd like to know too! I've been collecting used PC's, installing Ubuntu on them and giving them away through my church but I'm quickly finding out two things:
-1-If it doesn't have Windows installed, folks are a bit shy about taking one,
and
-2-my congregation has about exhausted who we can give these away to. I would like to broaden the group of people that could receive the rebuilt PC's......
I'm located in the Atlanta area and I have to believe there's a broader audience out there that could use a repurposed PC!
It's very easy to give up on "converting", if I can call it that. I'm actually pretty tired of touting the benefits or even attempting to show it anymore.
What seems to happen is you get a small group who enjoy using Linux, but that group doesn't often grow beyond roughly 10 members or so. More often than not it seems even the "group" never materializes at all.
People don't seem to be interested whether in a small town like mine or large one like yours. As you yourself pointed out, even giving them away, people are "shy" about taking it since it doesn't have Windows. It's near tantamount to psychological warfare.
What's more disappointing is when you have CEO's of companies like Red Hat and I believe even Mark Shuttleworth stating that the server market is where it's at, but not the desktop. The reason is simple enough, there are not enough desktop users. (I may be wrong about Mr. Shuttleworth, so please forgive if I am.)
I'm simply at a loss as to how to get people more interested, perhaps there never will be a lot? I hope that's not the case. I've often wondered what would happen if you could get a prominent business, organization, government establishment, etc in a local area to convert and tout the benefits if that would have any impact on a local community. But that's often a tall order to fill unless you know them well.
Last edited by siafulinux; April 17th, 2009 at 01:40 AM.
I definitely understand your frustration, but I would like to suggest keeping things in perspective. Why do people buy name brands when the generic stuff has exactly the same thing? MS just spent $350M on an ad campaign for Vista. $350M on a horrible OS. Red Hat made $500M in revenue total last year. The difference in marketing power between the two is astronomical. People will stay with what they know. Its not Linux specific.
I also think you will find it hard for businesses to talk about any IT systems they use. If doesn't support the bottom line, they don't care, which isn't unreasonable.
Desktop linux has been a viable option for most people only the last couple of years. Companies like Microsoft and Apple are over 30 years old. They have built enormous ecosystems (on purpose) that are dependent on them. Its an uphill battle.
As far Red hat CEO not believing in the desktop market, he may not think it can make money, but Red Hat is still sponsoring huge chunks of code that is put into Fedora and work its way into Ubuntu. For Mark's point of view, I would suggest watching this: http://ubuntupodcast.net/2009/04/14/...-shuttleworth/.
Ubuntu Podcast | Georgia Team | Wiki | Launchpad | #ubuntu-us-ga
http://boredandblogging.com
---------------------------------------------
You know what I find interesting - all the folks that I've introduced to Ubuntu really like it. THey find it easy to use and fast on the older hardware. So why doesn't word spread about it???? Baffles me....
I haven't given up on 'spreading the word' but I have started carrying Live CD's and showing folks what they can do with it....that's helped a time or two..... I am looking forward to some of the install events that are coming up - I have to believe that eventually, word will get out and more will come to see the benefits and overcome the fear.
I think the point made by BoredandBlogging is valid - folks are used to 'named brands' - Ubuntu to them has to sound like voodoo or sime kind of geeks-only club..... If the masses want to use Windows, let them - it keeps me employed!! LOL
Bookmarks