When giving reasons why Linux will never make it on the desktop, many people often cite some "killer app" available on Windows but not Linux. A big one, especially in the enterprise setting, is Microsoft Office. The reason they say it can't really be replaced by something like Open Office is incompatibility with MS Office file formats. I don't really buy that, mainly because every time an organization upgrades to a new version of MS Office, they face the same problem. Documents from Office 97 may not render correctly on Office 2003 and documents from Office 2007 may not open at all in Office XP. So, other than the file formats, what are some other reasons why people cling to MS Office and seem to despise Open Office (Other than the paper clip, I know how much everybody love him)?
Bookmarks