Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Beans
    203

    Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    As the title says....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Banville :(
    Beans
    119

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    I usually encode ripped CDs to Ogg 320kbps just because of the smaller file sizes. If I download something in flac, though, I usually leave it as it is. If I download mp3s or Oggs, I leave them as they are, too, because I don't want to degrade them any further by converting them to another format.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Beans
    2,307
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    .mp3

    Why?

    Compatibility.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Beans
    1,237
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    To my ears, there is no difference between OGG 320 and FLAC (yes I know FLAC is lossless)
    Since FLAC has a bigger file size, I would go with OGG

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Banville :(
    Beans
    119

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    Quote Originally Posted by gn2 View Post
    .mp3

    Why?

    Compatibility.
    If you are prepared to lose a hell of a lot of money, it's worth getting one of those iAudio players [amazon.co.uk]. Massively overpriced, but it identifies itself as a generic USB device so it works on anything, has a huge disk, and manages to play MPEG1 Layer 1/2/3, WMA, FLAC, OGG Vorbis, OGG FLAC, Apple Lossless, AAC/AAC+, AC3, True Audio, Monkey Audio, MusePack, WavPack, G.726, and PCM files without complaint.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Beans
    2,307
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    Quote Originally Posted by monsterstack View Post
    If you are prepared to lose a hell of a lot of money, it's worth getting one of those iAudio players.
    But that wouldn't make any difference to my car stereo or my household's range of assorted mobile phones

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Banville :(
    Beans
    119

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    Quote Originally Posted by gn2 View Post
    But that wouldn't make any difference to my car stereo or my household's range of assorted mobile phones
    Good point. But then you could always plug the device into your car's stereo and use it instead of your phone.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Beans
    2,307
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    Quote Originally Posted by monsterstack View Post
    Good point. But then you could always plug the device into your car's stereo and use it instead of your phone.
    Nope that wouldn't work either, the car stereo reads directly from USB flash drive or SD card.
    I just don't need (or want) a £200-odd quid portable media player.
    If I did, I would buy a netbook

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Beans
    3,165
    Distro
    Ubuntu Karmic Koala (testing)

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    If the file size is not important, flac is the best because it is loseless.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Flac or ogg 320 or others and why?

    If I download something or rip a CD to my collection it's always FLAC. I'll make 192kbps MP3s if I want to put it on my iPhone but for music on my computer, FLAC.
    arch 2008.06
    Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 | Asus Maximus II Formula | EVGA 8800GT Superclocked | 4GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 | Zalman ZM600-HP

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •