I don't know of any hacks to get the new kernels to work, and in general I wouldn't spend long time on such a computer.
Lubuntu 10.04 will give you one year more. You could also try Puppy.
I don't know of any hacks to get the new kernels to work, and in general I wouldn't spend long time on such a computer.
Lubuntu 10.04 will give you one year more. You could also try Puppy.
Bringing old hardware back to life. About problems due to upgrading.
Please visit Quick Links -> Unanswered Posts.
Don't use this space for a list of your hardware. It only creates false hits in the search engines.
Thanks for your help.
I've got LUbuntu 10.04 up and running on the AMD K6-2 (although it feels slower that the bloody ******* XP, I'm flabbergasted by that?!).
If there are any plans of keeping a non CMOV Ubuntu strain alive, I'd be interested to hear about it.
Furthermore all information about what Ubuntu software is impacted by the lack of a complete set of CMOV instuctions in the processor is also very welcome (e.g. only impacts kernel vs impacts X11 directly, etc).
To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail.
In the Buntu family there are no plans of supporting non-CMOV computers. You need to try other distros.
It surprises me that Lubuntu 10.04 is so slow. Does top show a heavy load?
Bringing old hardware back to life. About problems due to upgrading.
Please visit Quick Links -> Unanswered Posts.
Don't use this space for a list of your hardware. It only creates false hits in the search engines.
That's a shame, so the last of the Socket 7 CPU's outlived Ubuntu.
They don't build hardware like that any more.
Regarding loads, this is what I get:
107 processes for LUbuntu, pretty much?!Code:top - 10:09:32 up 8 min, 2 users, load average: 2.49, 1.71, 0.90 Tasks: 108 total, 1 running, 106 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 17.9%us, 8.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 72.6%id, 0.0%wa, 0.7%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st Mem: 250688k total, 242080k used, 8608k free, 11584k buffers Swap: 2062328k total, 0k used, 2062328k free, 134960k cached
To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail.
Bringing old hardware back to life. About problems due to upgrading.
Please visit Quick Links -> Unanswered Posts.
Don't use this space for a list of your hardware. It only creates false hits in the search engines.
To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail.
Does somebody know what Ubuntu software is impacted by the lack of a complete set of CMOV instructions in the processor? (e.g. only impacts kernel vs impacts X11 directly, etc).
In the pre-installation manual of 12.04 I found the following:
Where references 2 and 3 point to:Code:However, Ubuntu precise will not run on i586 or earlier processors. Despite the architecture name "i386", support for actual 80386 processors (and their clones) was dropped with the Sarge (r3.1) release of Debian[2]. (No version of Linux has ever supported the 286 or earlier chips in the series.) Support for i586 and lower processors, as well as for i686 processors without the cmov instruction, was dropped in Ubuntu 10.10. Most i686 and later processors are still supported[3].
This talks about dropping support for the i486, introduced in 1989 and not about the i686 (AMD K6-2) without a complete set of CMOV instructions.Code:[2] We have long tried to avoid this, but in the end it was necessary due a unfortunate series of issues with the compiler and the kernel, starting with an bug in the C++ ABI provided by GCC. You should still be able to run Ubuntu on actual 80386 processors if you compile your own kernel and compile all packages from source, but that is beyond the scope of this manual. [3] Many Ubuntu packages will actually run slightly faster on modern computers as a positive side effect of dropping support for these old chips. The i486, introduced in 1989, has three opcodes (bswap, cmpxchg, and xadd) which the i386, introduced in 1986, did not have. Previously, these could not be easily used by most Ubuntu packages; now they can.
Does somebody know what Ubuntu software is impacted by the lack of a complete set of CMOV instructions in the processor?
Last edited by martinr; June 29th, 2012 at 10:52 PM.
To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail.
To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail.
I don't know exactly which packages are running out of support, and regardless of the support question: As I mentioned before my advice is to consider switching to some (possibly used, but still) younger gear.
Bringing old hardware back to life. About problems due to upgrading.
Please visit Quick Links -> Unanswered Posts.
Don't use this space for a list of your hardware. It only creates false hits in the search engines.
Bookmarks