produces:Code:ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ | grep libopenal
A link to absolutely nothing. When I try and compile a program, understandably the linker says there is no such library.Code:lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Mar 6 2012 libopenal.so -> libopenal.so.1
Before this, I ran:
Code:apt-get install libopenal-devProduces:Code:apt-file show libopenal-dev
EDIT:::Code:libopenal-dev: /usr/include/AL/al.h libopenal-dev: /usr/include/AL/alc.h libopenal-dev: /usr/include/AL/alext.h libopenal-dev: /usr/include/AL/efx-creative.h libopenal-dev: /usr/include/AL/efx.h libopenal-dev: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenal.so libopenal-dev: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/openal.pc libopenal-dev: /usr/share/doc/libopenal-dev/README.Debian libopenal-dev: /usr/share/doc/libopenal-dev/changelog.Debian.gz libopenal-dev: /usr/share/doc/libopenal-dev/copyright
Trying to debug a program, I have had to install different version of openal, they were installed using cmake - which installed to the prefix usr/local, rather than the usr prefix that apt-get installed openal to. But, I "rm" every file in the cmake manifest. i think, to ensure, remove all from al-dev and alut-dev packages, then reinstall them. now, everytime, i get no actual library for openal, just a link to absolutely nothing.
Thanks.
Code:/usr$ find . -iname "*openal*" ./share/doc/libopenal-dev ./share/doc/libopenal-data ./share/doc/libopenal1 ./share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindOpenAL.cmake ./lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/wine/openal32.dll.so ./lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/wine/fakedlls/openal32.dll ./lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenal.so ./lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/openal.pc ./lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gstreamer-0.10/libgstopenal.so ./lib/i386-linux-gnu/wine/openal32.dll.so ./lib/i386-linux-gnu/wine/fakedlls/openal32.dll



Adv Reply
Bookmarks