Page 382 of 543 FirstFirst ... 282332372380381382383384392432482 ... LastLast
Results 3,811 to 3,820 of 5425

Thread: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

  1. #3811
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Beans
    182
    Distro
    Kubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    Quote Originally Posted by tista View Post
    Hi thopiekar.

    could you make some mockup, sample codes, patches, anything like that?
    at least I won't to see only ideas but also codes.
    because today we're strongly pushing stress to Luca to release all.
    so I think we'd better to talk about it with barebones of codes.

    Cheers.
    sure! working now on it at ppa:thopiekar/emgd
    I think I'll need a day for that, because I haven't packaged anything for a long time

    But as luca said. Rebuilding X 1.9 isn't easy, thats why the packages from the Xswat for example don't specify to use also downgraded libs for the build. So I'll need to prepare these packages to use downgraded libs. Hope it won't be that much libs that break the compiling process. Also the drivers which depend on X 1.9 need to be build against the downgraded X packages.

    Surely enough work for me.
    What we can also do is to copy X 1.9 from maverick to natty into our ppa. This would be as dirty as our script.

    PS: Stupid launchpad building system :/ Copied xorg-server from Xswat (maverick) to my ppa (natty) and it takes 18 hours until it starts to build it
    PSS: Made a build now locally with pbuilder. I'm sure the same will happen with the source on launchpad.
    Here is the build-log http://paste.ubuntu.com/600665/. Do you know which dependency needs to be downgraded here to get it build X 1.9?
    Last edited by thopiekar; April 29th, 2011 at 11:49 AM.

  2. #3812
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Niigata, JAPAN
    Beans
    862
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    Quote Originally Posted by thopiekar View Post
    sure! working now on it at ppa:thopiekar/emgd
    I think I'll need a day for that, because I haven't packaged anything for a long time

    But as luca said. Rebuilding X 1.9 isn't easy, thats why the packages from the Xswat for example don't specify to use also downgraded libs for the build. So I'll need to prepare these packages to use downgraded libs. Hope it won't be that much libs that break the compiling process. Also the drivers which depend on X 1.9 need to be build against the downgraded X packages.

    Surely enough work for me.
    What we can also do is to copy X 1.9 from maverick to natty into our ppa. This would be as dirty as our script.

    PS: Stupid launchpad building system :/ Copied xorg-server from Xswat (maverick) to my ppa (natty) and it takes 18 hours until it starts to build it
    Great thopiekar!

    I believe you could help us all..
    and don't worry about time manner.

    P.S:
    ahahaha!!
    18 hours ?! if I had such time, I could rebuild kernel and almost stuff of OS...

    Ciao.

  3. #3813
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Beans
    182
    Distro
    Kubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    hey tista

    can you help me with that?

    Quote Originally Posted by thopiekar View Post
    PSS: Made a build now locally with pbuilder. I'm sure the same will happen with the source on launchpad.
    Here is the build-log http://paste.ubuntu.com/600665/. Do you know which dependency needs to be downgraded here to get it build X 1.9?

  4. #3814
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Niigata, JAPAN
    Beans
    862
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    Quote Originally Posted by thopiekar View Post
    hey tista

    can you help me with that?
    @thopiekar

    yeah I've seen your log, and did it mean the error on line 3725:
    Code:
    ERROR:../../../test/xi2/protocol-xiselectevents.c:110:request_XISelectEvent: assertion failed: (rc == error)
    is it right?

    so could you make diff for protocol-xiselectevents.c between 1.9 and 1.10?
    now I'm googling, but unfortunately I could not hit usefull pages...

    Cheers.

    PS:
    I also give a try on local build Xorg packages from sources.
    Last edited by tista; April 29th, 2011 at 12:05 PM. Reason: added P.S

  5. #3815
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Beans
    182
    Distro
    Kubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    The most interesting lines are:
    Code:
    /xi2/eventconvert/XIFocusEvent: [dix] EventToXI2: Not implemented for 10 
    [dix] EventToXI2: Not implemented for 8
    To me it says that it is build aginist an ABI or what ever (I'm not familar with X) which is in version 10 (that is used for 1.10) but the test expects version 8.

    What could it be?
    Here the Build-Deps of our debian/control:
    Code:
    Build-Depends:
     debhelper (>= 5.0.0),
     quilt,
     lsb-release,
     pkg-config,
     bison,
     flex,
     automake,
     libtool,
     xutils-dev (>= 1:7.5+4),
     xfonts-utils (>= 1:7.5+1),
     x11proto-bigreqs-dev (>= 1:1.1.0),
     x11proto-composite-dev (>= 1:0.4), 
     x11proto-core-dev (>= 7.0.17),
     x11proto-damage-dev (>= 1.1),
     x11proto-fixes-dev (>= 1:4.1),
     x11proto-kb-dev (>= 1.0.3),
     x11proto-xinerama-dev,
     x11proto-randr-dev (>= 1.2.99.3),
     x11proto-record-dev (>= 1.13.99.1),
     x11proto-render-dev (>= 2:0.11),
     x11proto-resource-dev,
     x11proto-scrnsaver-dev,
     x11proto-video-dev,
     x11proto-xcmisc-dev (>= 1.2.0),
     x11proto-xext-dev (>= 7.0.99.3),
     x11proto-xf86bigfont-dev (>= 1.2.0),
     x11proto-xf86dga-dev (>= 2.0.99.1),
     x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev (>= 2.2.99.1),
     xtrans-dev (>= 1.2.2),
     libxau-dev (>= 1:1.0.5-2),
     x11proto-input-dev (>= 1.9.99.902),
     x11proto-dri2-dev (>= 2.3),
     libxdmcp-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxfont-dev (>= 1:1.4.2),
     libxkbfile-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libpixman-1-dev (>= 0.15.20),
     libpciaccess-dev (>= 0.11.0-2),
     libgcrypt-dev,
     nettle-dev,
     libdbus-1-dev [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
     libhal-dev [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
     libudev-dev (>= 151-3) [alpha amd64 arm armeb armel avr32 hppa i386 ia64 lpia m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc],
     libselinux1-dev (>= 2.0.80) [alpha amd64 arm armeb armel avr32 hppa i386 ia64 lpia m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc],
     x11proto-xf86dri-dev (>= 2.1.0),
     libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.3) [!hurd-i386],
     x11proto-gl-dev (>= 1.4.10),
     mesa-common-dev (>= 7.8),
     libgl1-mesa-dev (>= 7.8),
     libxmuu-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxext-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libx11-dev (>= 1:0.99.2),
     libxrender-dev (>= 1:0.9.0),
     libxi-dev (>= 2:1.2.99.1),
     x11proto-dmx-dev (>= 1:2.2.99.1),
     libdmx-dev (>= 1:1.0.1),
     libxpm-dev (>= 1:3.5.3),
     libxaw7-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxt-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxmu-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxtst-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxres-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxfixes-dev (>= 1:3.0.0),
     libxv-dev,
     libxinerama-dev,
    # unit tests
     libglib2.0-dev,
     xkb-data,
     x11-xkb-utils,
    btw. found this comment in the control-file:
    # all the Build-Depends up to x11proto-xf86-dri-dev are for the normal Xorg
    # server, and common dependencies for the DIX.
    # x11proto-xf86dri-dev and libdrm-dev are for DRI support for the Xorg server.
    # x11proto-print-dev and libfreetype6-dev are for Xprint
    # everything on is for the DMX and Xnest servers.
    so, downgrading x11proto-xf86-dri-dev is needed?

  6. #3816
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Niigata, JAPAN
    Beans
    862
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    Quote Originally Posted by thopiekar View Post
    The most interesting lines are:
    Code:
    /xi2/eventconvert/XIFocusEvent: [dix] EventToXI2: Not implemented for 10 
    [dix] EventToXI2: Not implemented for 8
    To me it says that it is build aginist an ABI or what ever (I'm not familar with X) which is in version 10 (that is used for 1.10) but the test expects version 8.

    What could it be?
    Here the Build-Deps of our debian/control:
    Code:
    Build-Depends:
     debhelper (>= 5.0.0),
     quilt,
     lsb-release,
     pkg-config,
     bison,
     flex,
     automake,
     libtool,
     xutils-dev (>= 1:7.5+4),
     xfonts-utils (>= 1:7.5+1),
     x11proto-bigreqs-dev (>= 1:1.1.0),
     x11proto-composite-dev (>= 1:0.4), 
     x11proto-core-dev (>= 7.0.17),
     x11proto-damage-dev (>= 1.1),
     x11proto-fixes-dev (>= 1:4.1),
     x11proto-kb-dev (>= 1.0.3),
     x11proto-xinerama-dev,
     x11proto-randr-dev (>= 1.2.99.3),
     x11proto-record-dev (>= 1.13.99.1),
     x11proto-render-dev (>= 2:0.11),
     x11proto-resource-dev,
     x11proto-scrnsaver-dev,
     x11proto-video-dev,
     x11proto-xcmisc-dev (>= 1.2.0),
     x11proto-xext-dev (>= 7.0.99.3),
     x11proto-xf86bigfont-dev (>= 1.2.0),
     x11proto-xf86dga-dev (>= 2.0.99.1),
     x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev (>= 2.2.99.1),
     xtrans-dev (>= 1.2.2),
     libxau-dev (>= 1:1.0.5-2),
     x11proto-input-dev (>= 1.9.99.902),
     x11proto-dri2-dev (>= 2.3),
     libxdmcp-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxfont-dev (>= 1:1.4.2),
     libxkbfile-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libpixman-1-dev (>= 0.15.20),
     libpciaccess-dev (>= 0.11.0-2),
     libgcrypt-dev,
     nettle-dev,
     libdbus-1-dev [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
     libhal-dev [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
     libudev-dev (>= 151-3) [alpha amd64 arm armeb armel avr32 hppa i386 ia64 lpia m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc],
     libselinux1-dev (>= 2.0.80) [alpha amd64 arm armeb armel avr32 hppa i386 ia64 lpia m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc],
     x11proto-xf86dri-dev (>= 2.1.0),
     libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.3) [!hurd-i386],
     x11proto-gl-dev (>= 1.4.10),
     mesa-common-dev (>= 7.8),
     libgl1-mesa-dev (>= 7.8),
     libxmuu-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxext-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libx11-dev (>= 1:0.99.2),
     libxrender-dev (>= 1:0.9.0),
     libxi-dev (>= 2:1.2.99.1),
     x11proto-dmx-dev (>= 1:2.2.99.1),
     libdmx-dev (>= 1:1.0.1),
     libxpm-dev (>= 1:3.5.3),
     libxaw7-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxt-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxmu-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxtst-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxres-dev (>= 1:0.99.1),
     libxfixes-dev (>= 1:3.0.0),
     libxv-dev,
     libxinerama-dev,
    # unit tests
     libglib2.0-dev,
     xkb-data,
     x11-xkb-utils,
    btw. found this comment in the control-file:


    so, downgrading x11proto-xf86-dri-dev is needed?
    yeah I think so.
    Natty would provide ABI 10 dev packages when you build and/or solve build dependencies...
    but I really don't know how we use downgraded dev packages.
    could you port all dev packages from maverick as you need..

  7. #3817
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Beans
    182
    Distro
    Kubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    Quote Originally Posted by tista View Post
    yeah I think so.
    Natty would provide ABI 10 dev packages when you build and/or solve build dependencies...
    but I really don't know how we use downgraded dev packages.
    could you port all dev packages from maverick as you need..
    rebuilding older dev packages was what I planned to do to get a working build of X 1.9..
    make a build using older packages is quite simple.. you set as build dep that it needs a package XY which version isn't higher than Z.
    I'm busy the next hours, so it would be very kind if someone can ask on IRC (maybe in the channel of the Xswat) what we need to downgrade or whatever to build against the ABI 8.

    I'll be later on IRC, too. Which channel do we use?

  8. #3818
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Beans
    2,184

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    Quote Originally Posted by thopiekar View Post
    rebuilding older dev packages was what I planned to do to get a working build of X 1.9..
    make a build using older packages is quite simple.. you set as build dep that it needs a package XY which version isn't higher than Z.
    I'm busy the next hours, so it would be very kind if someone can ask on IRC (maybe in the channel of the Xswat) what we need to downgrade or whatever to build against the ABI 8.

    I'll be later on IRC, too. Which channel do we use?
    We don't have a IRC channel.. could be nice to have one.. also to remove all these dev messages from thread.

    #ubuntu-x is the channel for xorg guys.
    Last edited by lucazade; April 29th, 2011 at 01:58 PM.

  9. #3819
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Beans
    2,184

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    registered our channel: #gma500 on freenode server ... i'm in!

    @thopiekar: I didn't recognize you! now i've seen your account on lp. Hi!
    Last edited by lucazade; April 29th, 2011 at 02:08 PM.

  10. #3820
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Niigata, JAPAN
    Beans
    862
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Guide to Get the Best Performace from the GMA 500

    @Luca

    I'm in,too!

Page 382 of 543 FirstFirst ... 282332372380381382383384392432482 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •