Power Management is off!
Looks like setting the router to 20/40MHz instead of 20MHz (only 2 settings) doubled the speed that was displayed not only on this card but also on the N13 adapter in the...
Type: Posts; User: Akacheebe; Keyword(s):
Power Management is off!
Looks like setting the router to 20/40MHz instead of 20MHz (only 2 settings) doubled the speed that was displayed not only on this card but also on the N13 adapter in the...
Humm, don't quite understand all that but what it seems to mean to me is there's no easy solution? Yes/no?
FYI I've got "several" computers on my LAN and I record a lot of FTA TV from satellite...
I've had problems with N speeds being slow starting with an N13 Asus adapter that I had last year. Never did get that issue resolved and finally gave up and just went back to the wired connection. ...
This one fixed the update errors on my system.
Impavidus thanks for your reply. You're right that it was going to update both the 3.11.0 and 3.5.0 kernels. That is why I ran that one line removal tool but like I said, next thing I know it's...
I've got a question about this one line old kernel removal tool in your signature. As you know from the last post I made I did an upgrade to 3.11.0-17 on my 3 desktop systems but was waiting for...
OK, so I finally got this all figured out, and thanks for the help!;)
Here's some additional data on this network printing problem.
sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The...
Early this week I posted another thread dealing with multiple kernels being updated each time and update was released. Here is that thread
...
Please delete as this problem seems to have fixed itself??
Kernel 3.2.0 is now officially gone and I've successfully rebooted twice. Only one listed now is 3.5.0-46 which was installed last week. Maybe try the 3.11.0 upgrade tomorrow but will start...
Well actually no. I haven't uninstalled the 3.2.0 kernel yet. I've got to talk myself into it as this is one of those "first time" deals for me. Will probably do that tonight when I go in the...
This system must have upgraded to 3.5.0 on it's own as I didn't install that kernel?
I did a clean install the other day for a friend using 12.04.4 and that one has 3.11.0 in it by default? So...
Yeah, the idea is to get rid of stuff that's not being used so I don't have to waste bandwidth downloading it in the future.
So should I try to remove them via Synaptic? I've read where it's easy...
They got my old username back but it's still me.
I looked in Synaptic and it shows green squares next to the 3.2.0 kernel and also on the 3.5.0 kernel. Here's the result of that entry.
...
Well, I guess this is probably the first time you ever ran up on anyone with a computer with this many operating systems/hard drives? I'll bet you hope it's your last too! 6 hard drives and each...
F0302D81302D5040 is the one I created by accident in SAMBA. Notice in the cat fstab I just posted that it's commented out, ie, ## in front of that line. THAT was how I got the "drive not ready or...
OK here's the output from your last request. Dunno what's up but everything is working fine from this end??
xxxx@ubuntu-shop:~$ mount
/dev/sdf1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on...
I think I can also answer your question regarding the "Local Disk" label on sde5. After the reload of sda1 the drive letter assignment didn't come up the way it previously was as sda5 was known by...
Before we go any further let me give you some FYI here.
I got to thinking after I saw that second sda1 listed in cat fstab that when I first reconnected all the drives and then booted into...
OOPS! ERROR? This UUID was in one of the first fstab posts I made? In fact, one of the early posts had two sda1 listed and this one was one of them. I've included another cat of fstab that shows...
Not sure I understand this part as it still will not automount? In fact, THAT is the part that aggravates me the most as I have to baby sit Ubuntu when it doesn't find sda1 at boot?
It seems it...
Interesting stuff here now. I put some notes on the code part with ## in front of them. This has got to be something simple that we're overlooking?? Doesn't Grub have something to do with mounting...
I've included a copy paste of fstab that shows sda1 doesn't have the #? Dunno. Keep in mind that nothing was done to sda5 and that partition is accessable in Ubuntu, on my network and is mounted at...
Here ya go.
xxxx@ubuntu-shop:~$ mount
/dev/sdf1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
none...