If you can't figure out how to configure resolvconf then you can disable it by removing the symbolic link at /etc/resolv.conf and putting a static file there. Even then it's usually best to leave the...
Type: Posts; User: jdthood; Keyword(s):
If you can't figure out how to configure resolvconf then you can disable it by removing the symbolic link at /etc/resolv.conf and putting a static file there. Even then it's usually best to leave the...
There's a bug report covering the phenomenon of the disappearing /etc/resolv.conf symbolic link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1000244
Over time the malfunction has...
There's a bug report covering the phenomenon of the disappearing /etc/resolv.conf symbolic link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1000244
Over time the malfunction has...
It appears that /etc/resolv.conf is no longer a symbolic link to ../run/resolvconf/resolv.conf on your machine. It is fine to remove the symbolic link so that you can experiment with different values...
Yes, the order in which nameserver addresses are listed in resolv.conf matters. The glibc resolver tries the addresses in the listed order until it receives an answer.
This explains why you cannot...
On Ubuntu 12.04 or later you do not normally edit /etc/resolv.conf directly. /etc/resolv.conf is a symbolic link to /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf which is a file dynamically generated by the resolvconf...
In general you need different DNS search domains for different networks. Likewise, for different networks your machine needs to use different DNS nameserver addresses. That is why, in Ubuntu 12.04...
That is now correct; /etc/resolv.conf is a symbolic link to the file that resolvconf generates at /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf.
You are running NetworkManager. Resolvconf writes resolv.conf based...
Please post the output of those "dig" and "ping" commands too.
@lyianx: Ubuntu Server networking is configured in /etc/network/interfaces as mentioned earlier. Ubuntu Desktop includes the NetworkManager utility which offers a GUI for network configuration. If...
If you were running Ubuntu then I would say that something is wrong here. The resolvconf Upstart job is in the "running" state but /etc/resolv.conf is not a symbolic link to...
If you removed the resolvconf package you should now probably reinstall it.
That is as it should be. The resolver should communicate with dnscrypt-proxy which is — or should be — listening at address 127.0.0.2.
Minor point: I'd suggest putting the pidfile in...
[QUOTE=htorres;12698821]
sudo cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE...
What is the output of
ls -l /etc/resolv.conf
cat /etc/resolv.conf
cat /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
nm-tool | grep -i dns
This may be irrelevant but I notice that your resolv.conf file is nonstandard. That's not what resolvconf outputs. Is /etc/resolv.conf a symbolic link to "../run/resolvconf/resolv.conf"?
It may help to edit /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf and comment out "dns=dnsmasq" and then to restart network-manager or reboot.
Can you ping 139.7.30.126 and 139.7.30.125? Can you resolve hostnames with these nameservers, e.g., `dig @139.7.30.126 www.google.com`?
Here's the patch which should be applied to /etc/resolvconf/update.d/dnsmasq to cause dnsmasq to be dnscrypt-aware on a resolvconf system. Once this patch is applied, on a resolvconf system, dnsmasq...
What's the output of
cat /etc/resolv.conf
cat /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
nm-tool|grep -i dns
Enter the configuration system of your accesspointmodemrouter and look for a feature which restricts Wi-Fi traffic to HTTP or "web" traffic. Disable it.
I just noticed that there's an ITP for dnscrypt-proxy in the Debian BTS (http://bugs.debian.org/692320). I have submitted a request that this future package support resolvconf.
Once this is done...
I have filed a report in the Debian bug tracking system where I wish for automagic integration of dnsmasq with dnscrypt-proxy: http://bugs.debian.org/709179. The Debian maintainer has already agreed...
Hi. You are not the first to experience this. Please report your experience with as many relevant details as possible to bug #1000244.
*...
First let me say that I appreciate what you are trying to do. It's good that you were able to get dnsmasq and dnscrypt working together in daisy chain with the former (dnsmasq, first stage) caching...