Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree that we are going to keep agreeing and disagreeing about the same things.
The reason is that I also would like to note that I did not properly explain my concept:
I want *two* lines.
One - a disagreement; two - a statement relating to the disagreement. For example the first line here is the disagreement, and everything after that is the related statement.
So- for example
"
Post 1: Emacs is the most awesome editor ever
Post 2:
-laughing child"
Vim is, for some reason I can't explain, better. I think it just makes me feel different.
Post 3:
...
...
"
Re: Disagree with the user above you
Actually, I just re-read the rules and now disagree with what I just said.
I'm an idiot.
Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree that chriswyatt is an idiot.
Chriswyatt needs a boost to his self-esteem.
Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree with movement and vote for Inertia .
Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree that that statement disagreed with my statement... I also disagree that it was two lines.
So I continue to assert that chriswyatt needs a boost to his self-esteem.
Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree that this thread has gone off topic about chriswyatt.
Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree!
You see, this thread has no topic.
Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree. the topic of this thread is "disagreeing".
Re: Disagree with the user above you
I disagree!
This thread is deeper than that!
Re: Disagree with the user above you
This thread is about as shallow as rain on concrete. Simply posting "I disagree" is not the way to disagree - you need to at least explain why you think the user you disagree with, is wrong.
Also, this thread should be moved to 'recurring" - or do you really believe this is the only thread where every poster disagrees with the previous post ?