HippoMan
December 5th, 2005, 09:43 PM
I'm requesting that runit-1.3.1 be ported to backports.
The author of the "runit" package is also a Debian developer, and he very rapidly makes Debian packages of his new versions and puts them into "sid". Currently, that's version 1.3.1 of runit, although we have only version 1.2.3 in the Ubuntu repositories.
This newer version adds the new "sv" command which I now am using via the non-dpkg (tar.gz) build of runit-1.3.1 that I sadly have to make use of on my otherwise all "apt-get" based system. Version 1.2.3 does not have this "sv" command.
Furthermore, there are a few other new features that were added between 1.2.3 and 1.3.1.
This 1.3.1 code is built with the same libraries and tools as the earlier version.
Given that runit-1.2.3 is already an official Ubuntu package, and given that 1.3.1 is an equally official Debian package (as was 1.2.3 several months ago), and given that there is indeed new functionality and no changes in its build or runtime requirements, the posting guidelines seem to indicate that version 1.3.1 is eligible to be ported to backports.
I hereby am making that request.
Thank you very much.
The author of the "runit" package is also a Debian developer, and he very rapidly makes Debian packages of his new versions and puts them into "sid". Currently, that's version 1.3.1 of runit, although we have only version 1.2.3 in the Ubuntu repositories.
This newer version adds the new "sv" command which I now am using via the non-dpkg (tar.gz) build of runit-1.3.1 that I sadly have to make use of on my otherwise all "apt-get" based system. Version 1.2.3 does not have this "sv" command.
Furthermore, there are a few other new features that were added between 1.2.3 and 1.3.1.
This 1.3.1 code is built with the same libraries and tools as the earlier version.
Given that runit-1.2.3 is already an official Ubuntu package, and given that 1.3.1 is an equally official Debian package (as was 1.2.3 several months ago), and given that there is indeed new functionality and no changes in its build or runtime requirements, the posting guidelines seem to indicate that version 1.3.1 is eligible to be ported to backports.
I hereby am making that request.
Thank you very much.