PDA

View Full Version : Which nsplugginwrapper-flash better in Aur?

medic2000
November 15th, 2008, 09:29 AM
There are 3 of them. I want to use flash10 without a problem. Which one i should choose?

And my system is 64bit.
mips
November 15th, 2008, 09:52 AM
aur/nspluginwrapper-flash-beta 10.0.12.10-1 [10.0.0.525-2 installed]

I'm using the above one without any hassles.
medic2000
November 15th, 2008, 10:39 AM
Thanks mips! I was using the flash9 one. Now i will try the package you suggested.

By the way why 10 still beta?
mips
November 15th, 2008, 07:42 PM
By the way why 10 still beta?
No idea.
Ayuthia
November 16th, 2008, 11:22 AM
I have been using:
aur/nspluginwrapper-beta 1.1.4-1 [installed]
and
archlinuxfr/lib32-flashplugin 10.0.12.36-1 [installed] (lib32)

I thought that I did this instead of nspluginwrapper-flash-beta because the beta version of nspluginwrapper was able to get flash 10 to not have the menu items show up underneath the flash player. I am not a heavy flash player user but I have not run into any major issues yet.
Ayuthia
November 18th, 2008, 01:06 AM
Not for sure if you are into trying out alphas or not, but Adobe has come out with an alpha for Flash 64-bit on Linux:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081117-adobe-starts-64-bit-flash-testing-with-linux-alpha.html

I just uninstalled nspluginwrapper and downloaded the alpha. It seems to work, but I have not done too much with it yet.

EDIT:
It looks like it has been talked about already in the forum:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=985479