PDA

View Full Version : [ubuntu] [SOLVED] Check sums don't match


mregister
October 8th, 2008, 08:55 AM
Hello All,

I originally posted this in the AB forum but this forum may be better.

I ran a tiger report and here is what I got:

--WARN-- [osv004w] Unreleased Debian GNU/Linux version `lenny/sid'

AND

--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.pcimap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.dep' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.ieee1394map' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.usbmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.isapnpmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.inputmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.seriomap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.alias' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.symbols' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/usr/share/php/.filemap' checksum differs from installed package 'php-pear'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/usr/share/php/.depdb' checksum differs from installed package 'php-pear'.


After looking around it seems that this may be ok but I am not sure. I have read that if the chekcsums don't match then there might be a problem. I ran rkhunter and it did not find anything and my access.log does not show anything unusual.

Should I be worried?

cariboo907
October 8th, 2008, 02:32 PM
You may need to update the digital signatures check the readme file in /usr/share/doc/tiger to find out how to do the update.

Jim

mregister
October 9th, 2008, 10:41 AM
The two file used to do the check are mksig and mkfilelist but neither of those two file exist on my system. I will digg around some more and report back. I may end up just doing a compleate reload of the system (it's not yet in production) then get the right chekcsums from tiger. I installed and ran tiger after playing around a bit.

mregister
October 9th, 2008, 01:40 PM
Ok it seems that the only thing to do within Ubuntu is run a report then use it for a template that tiger will use to chekc against. I have set this up and will report any errors.

doas777
October 9th, 2008, 10:39 PM
I got the same error, and started this (http://sudan.ubuntuforums.com/showthread.php?t=908771) thread on it. A number of other users had the same results so i believe it's a system-specific false positive. I haven't yet found anyone with an up to date hardy that didn't get these messages, so either you are safe or we are all screwed.

cheers,
Franklin

mregister
October 10th, 2008, 08:41 AM
Yeah I think we are OK. It seems that for tiger to work right you have to run a report as soon as you install everything then run a report and use that report for a templete.
I will mark this as solved.