mregister
October 8th, 2008, 08:55 AM
Hello All,
I originally posted this in the AB forum but this forum may be better.
I ran a tiger report and here is what I got:
--WARN-- [osv004w] Unreleased Debian GNU/Linux version `lenny/sid'
AND
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.pcimap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.dep' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.ieee1394map' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.usbmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.isapnpmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.inputmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.seriomap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.alias' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.symbols' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/usr/share/php/.filemap' checksum differs from installed package 'php-pear'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/usr/share/php/.depdb' checksum differs from installed package 'php-pear'.
After looking around it seems that this may be ok but I am not sure. I have read that if the chekcsums don't match then there might be a problem. I ran rkhunter and it did not find anything and my access.log does not show anything unusual.
Should I be worried?
I originally posted this in the AB forum but this forum may be better.
I ran a tiger report and here is what I got:
--WARN-- [osv004w] Unreleased Debian GNU/Linux version `lenny/sid'
AND
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.pcimap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.dep' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.ieee1394map' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.usbmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.isapnpmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.inputmap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.seriomap' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.alias' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-server/modules.symbols' checksum differs from installed package 'linux-image-2.6.24-19-server'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/usr/share/php/.filemap' checksum differs from installed package 'php-pear'.
--FAIL-- [lin005f] Installed file `/usr/share/php/.depdb' checksum differs from installed package 'php-pear'.
After looking around it seems that this may be ok but I am not sure. I have read that if the chekcsums don't match then there might be a problem. I ran rkhunter and it did not find anything and my access.log does not show anything unusual.
Should I be worried?