Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

[casper_2095]

Hi

I see Ubuntu defaults to Apache 2.0 whereas the majority of hosting providers (well mine at least) are offering Apache 1.3.

What issues are likely to arise if I develop with v2.0 then try to deploy onto v1.3?

[simon w]

Well that depends on what your are developing and what, if any, modules you require...

[Nap_BlownApart]

Casper is making a significant point.
My web hoster, as well as clients for whom I do web applic. development are all running Apache 1.3.

Is it possible to get a package up for 1.3? That way it could be at least an option through Synaptic or Aptitude?

Cheers,
Nap

[FakeOutdoorsman]

Apace 1.3.32-2 is listed in Synaptic for me because I added the Universe and Multiverse repositories. You can do that with easyUbuntu (http://easyubuntu.freecontrib.org/) or with "System" > "Administration" > "Software Properties". You'll either want to develop specifically for Apache 1.3 or move to an Apache 2.0 host.

Adding the Universe and Multiverse Repositories (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories/Ubuntu#head-5bbef89639d9a7d93fe38f6356dc17847d373096)

[Nap_BlownApart]

Fake,

I've done the same as you with my /etc/apt/sources.list but Synaptic on my systems has 1.3.34 listed. I'm in Australia, if that makes a difference?

Has anyone else out there found 1.3.37 mentioned?

Cheers,
Nap

[FakeOutdoorsman]

My sources has the us prefix. Example:

http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/

Perhaps yours are au and they might contain different packages. I'm not sure though.

[Nap_BlownApart]

You are right, mine is 'au'.
Thanks for that.

Any other country codes out there? (Ones that might have 1.3.37 mentioned?)