mips
August 5th, 2008, 07:28 AM
Ever since I got my LG W2252TQ LCD I have not been happy happy with the image results. My old HP p1230 was and still is stunning when it comes to image reproduction after it was calibrated by eye as I'm not going to splash out $$$ on hardware.
I initially tried my same MO for calibrating my LCD but was not happy with the outcome. Getting the Gamma set on a LCD is an absolute biatch due to the difference in viewing angles (S-IPS panels handle this the best)
I set my monitor to the factory defaults and choose a colour temp (check for your defaults):
Brightness 100/100
Contrast 70/100
Colour Temperature sRGB
Sharpness 5/10
Next I turned the room lights off and worked in semi darkness. Also keep in mind that when you test you should look at the display from a distance and not always up close like you do for normal use.
I opened nvidia-settings to adjust Brightness, Contrast & Gamma as I did not want to fiddle with the monitor control panel. All setting were done with nvidia settings and then saved to xorg.conf.
I then followed the first link below to start the calibration. I played around for about an hour. As you progress through the steps you start noticing some of the previous steps have gone out of whack so it really is a fine balancing act to get a reasonable output. So I ended up skipping between the different sections to get the best result. I then followed the rest of the links just to suss things out and I have a pretty decent display at the moment although the gamma is still not perfect.
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints1A.html
http://epaperpress.com/monitorcal/
http://www.colorwizzard.com/lcdtest/index.html#_top
http://www.pcbypaul.com/software/monica.html
The last link above is for a Linux gamma utility called Monica which I have not tried on my LCD yet but I recall it working nicely with my CRT.
I would advise anybody with a monitor to calibrate to ensure your display is optimally set. This way the photo you see from your camera or a website you know would be an accurate representation.
I would also encourage web designers & gfx artists to definately do this so you know what your stuff actually really looks like.
The above steps can also be use to calibrate a CRT which is generally easier.
EDIT:
I have noticed that the changes I made are not persistant even though I ran nvidia-setting with sudo in order to save the changes to the xorg.conf
To make the changes persistant:
nano ~/.nvidia-settings-rc
0/RedBrightness=-0.17
0/GreenBrightness=-0.17
0/BlueBrightness=-0.17
0/RedContrast=-0.14
0/GreenContrast=-0.14
0/BlueContrast=-0.14
0/RedGamma=1.013
0/GreenGamma=1.013
0/BlueGamma=1.013sudo nano /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section "Monitor"
# HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "Unknown"
ModelName "LG W2252"
HorizSync 30.0 - 83.0
VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
Gamma 1.013 1.013 1.013
Option "DPMS"
EndSection
I initially tried my same MO for calibrating my LCD but was not happy with the outcome. Getting the Gamma set on a LCD is an absolute biatch due to the difference in viewing angles (S-IPS panels handle this the best)
I set my monitor to the factory defaults and choose a colour temp (check for your defaults):
Brightness 100/100
Contrast 70/100
Colour Temperature sRGB
Sharpness 5/10
Next I turned the room lights off and worked in semi darkness. Also keep in mind that when you test you should look at the display from a distance and not always up close like you do for normal use.
I opened nvidia-settings to adjust Brightness, Contrast & Gamma as I did not want to fiddle with the monitor control panel. All setting were done with nvidia settings and then saved to xorg.conf.
I then followed the first link below to start the calibration. I played around for about an hour. As you progress through the steps you start noticing some of the previous steps have gone out of whack so it really is a fine balancing act to get a reasonable output. So I ended up skipping between the different sections to get the best result. I then followed the rest of the links just to suss things out and I have a pretty decent display at the moment although the gamma is still not perfect.
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints1A.html
http://epaperpress.com/monitorcal/
http://www.colorwizzard.com/lcdtest/index.html#_top
http://www.pcbypaul.com/software/monica.html
The last link above is for a Linux gamma utility called Monica which I have not tried on my LCD yet but I recall it working nicely with my CRT.
I would advise anybody with a monitor to calibrate to ensure your display is optimally set. This way the photo you see from your camera or a website you know would be an accurate representation.
I would also encourage web designers & gfx artists to definately do this so you know what your stuff actually really looks like.
The above steps can also be use to calibrate a CRT which is generally easier.
EDIT:
I have noticed that the changes I made are not persistant even though I ran nvidia-setting with sudo in order to save the changes to the xorg.conf
To make the changes persistant:
nano ~/.nvidia-settings-rc
0/RedBrightness=-0.17
0/GreenBrightness=-0.17
0/BlueBrightness=-0.17
0/RedContrast=-0.14
0/GreenContrast=-0.14
0/BlueContrast=-0.14
0/RedGamma=1.013
0/GreenGamma=1.013
0/BlueGamma=1.013sudo nano /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section "Monitor"
# HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "Unknown"
ModelName "LG W2252"
HorizSync 30.0 - 83.0
VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
Gamma 1.013 1.013 1.013
Option "DPMS"
EndSection