View Full Version : [ubuntu] Hardy vs. Etch?
Luke has no name
May 5th, 2008, 04:13 AM
Which is better on:
-Stability
-Ease of Installation (Including initial server installs, like LAMP/mail/SSH/etc.
-Ease of package installation
-Performance
I have my hypotheses, but I'd like to see what others have to say before I chime in.
hyper_ch
May 5th, 2008, 04:41 AM
Etch
Not as new packages as Hardy but Debian is rockstable. Installtion and package management is the same (Ubuntu is Debian based).
As this is the server section then i assume, you will not install gui on it. For package management sue then apt-get or aptitude from the cli.
Luke has no name
May 6th, 2008, 03:13 AM
Anyone else?
agim
May 6th, 2008, 03:17 AM
two different animals, though of course related.
If you want stability and performance, certainly Etch. If you want the latest and greatest programs and technologies, then Hardy is the choice.
Thats oversimplified, but I think its what you are looking for.
FakeOutdoorsman
May 6th, 2008, 02:12 PM
It depends on what you are planning on using the machine for. If it is for home or hobby use, then Ubuntu Server is great. If it is for business, especially if you will have client data on the machine, go with Debian Etch.
Stability: Debian
Ease of Installation: Ubuntu, but fairly similar
Ease of package installation: Same
Performance: Either. Depends on the "heft" or customization of your install.
koenn
May 6th, 2008, 02:51 PM
two different animals, though of course related.
... If you want the latest and greatest programs and technologies, then Hardy is the choice.
Etch is quite recent, so the difference in "latest and greatest" is going to be relatively minor.
If you're planning to track LTS (not unusual unless you're planning on upgrading/re-installing that server every six months), "latest" is of relative importance anyway.
Ubuntu may be more advanced / soffisticated in integration, especially the pre-defined tasks (eg LAMP), but the basic tools (apt, dpkg) and the software are the same as debian's.
As long as we're talking servers without GUI, you'd have trouble telling the difference between one and the other once they're setup, except maybe for the difference in su / sudo.
songshu
May 7th, 2008, 06:16 AM
etch +1
no doubt about it
juan@forum
May 8th, 2008, 12:08 AM
etch is a excellent choice, but maybe it is not what you want
i used a lot in my office in all my servers
but...
one cool thing about ubuntu is that you can get official support from canonical
for an organization or company is really nice to know you can get some support in the case you will need it
i would use ubuntu server TLS edition, in that way your server will be stable for at least five years
etch will be old stable at the end of this year.
songshu
May 8th, 2008, 01:46 AM
etch will be old stable at the end of this year.
lol ;)
you want to make a bed that it isn't ?
juan@forum
May 8th, 2008, 08:32 AM
lol ;)
you want to make a bed that it isn't ?
Taken from the the debian lists:
-------------
Now on to the draft of the timeline:
August 2007
Start of the first BSP marathon for Lenny, lasting till November. [1]
Early September 2007
The list of release blockers for Lenny is frozen.
Early March 2008
Very soft freeze: Please be extra careful with new versions, and new
transitions. At this point, the list of release goals is frozen.
Start of the second BSP marathon for Lenny.
Early April 2008
Freze of the essential toolchain.
Mid of June 2008
Freeze of the non-essential toolchain and all libraries.
Mid of July 2008
Full freeze.
Early September 2008
Release!
Of course, "Early September" is only an internal goal as of now, the
official communications is "in the second half of 2008".
-------------
Monicker
May 8th, 2008, 08:36 AM
Debian has always been noticeable faster than Ubuntu on my laptop. I'm running a combination of Etch and Lenny packages at the moment. I use apt-pinning to have the Lenny packages available, but only install them when I want or need them. Stability has been great. I do all my package management from the command line, but you can still install Synaptic. I run mysql, apache, postfix, and a number of other services on it.
songshu
May 8th, 2008, 08:41 AM
Of course, "Early September" is only an internal goal as of now, the
official communications is "in the second half of 2008".
-------------
great,
that would mean release somewhere mid 2009
lenny will not ship intil its ready and bugs are squashed
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.