PDA

View Full Version : Quickreply not working


hyper_ch
April 26th, 2008, 08:04 AM
So, the small quickreply button at the bottom of each post isn't working anymore (at least for me).

Anyone else experiencing this?

forestpixie
April 26th, 2008, 09:23 AM
I had same problem with NoScript blocking yahooapis - don't know if that helps

kevdog
April 26th, 2008, 09:35 AM
Working for me -- but Im not using no-script either.

vexorian
April 26th, 2008, 11:38 AM
I had same problem with NoScript blocking yahooapis - don't know if that helps
I call this a bug. I tested and enabling yahooapis fixes the issue, but I will leave it as untrusted.

I don't have any information at what yahooapis is , and the forum does not notify me of it, I do not agree with giving javascript rights to some script that comes from an unknown place just for something that's supposed to be part of this forum's functionality.

Please someone fix this.

matthew
April 26th, 2008, 11:43 AM
I call this a bug. I tested and enabling yahooapis fixes the issue, but I will leave it as untrusted.

I don't have any information at what yahooapis is , and the forum does not notify me of it
Read the upgrade FAQ (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4761308#post4761308). We did post information about this in the last Q/A on the page.

hyper_ch
April 27th, 2008, 06:08 AM
Also using NoScript and it's the yahooapis stuff. But I still wonder as to why this function does not work if an outside thing is blocked?

LaRoza
April 27th, 2008, 06:11 AM
Also using NoScript and it's the yahooapis stuff. But I still wonder as to why this function does not work if an outside thing is blocked?

"outside thing"? Yahooapis is hosted by Yahoo, not UF. In the future, it may be hosted locally, but for now, it is remote.

hyper_ch
April 27th, 2008, 06:26 AM
"outside thing"? Yahooapis is hosted by Yahoo, not UF.
That's what I meant ;)

vexorian
April 28th, 2008, 12:45 AM
Read the upgrade FAQ (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4761308#post4761308). We did post information about this in the last Q/A on the page.

Wow, I knew vBulletin would eventually screw up since it is proprietary and all, I just didn't think that was going to happen so soon!, I am glad the only vB forum I administrate took the decision to stay on 3.5.0, if the layout changes in 3.7.0 weren't terrible this whole idea of making the functionality depend on an external site really is a terrible design flaw in vBulletin. The good news about this is that this will let FOSS forum software solutions more costumers.

It is interesting to see vB as a case of a product reaching critical mass feature mass and eventually destroy itself, hopefully 3.5 can last a couple of years more in my forums.

p_quarles
April 28th, 2008, 01:49 AM
this whole idea of making the functionality depend on an external site really is a terrible design flaw in vBulletin.
It doesn't depend on an external site. Yahoo! offers hosting for their APIs, but users of those APIs are under no obligation to take them up on that. In other words, one can decline their offer and choose to host the YUI files on their own servers.

It would be nice if people could look into the matter a bit more deeply and thoughtfully before making inflammatory statements like that.

hyper_ch
April 28th, 2008, 02:16 AM
Wow, I knew vBulletin would eventually screw up since it is proprietary and all, I just didn't think that was going to happen so soon!

But it's still Open Source ;)

LaRoza
April 28th, 2008, 08:55 AM
Wow, I knew vBulletin would eventually screw up since it is proprietary and all, I just didn't think that was going to happen so soon!, I am glad the only vB forum I administrate took the decision to stay on 3.5.0, if the layout changes in 3.7.0 weren't terrible this whole idea of making the functionality depend on an external site really is a terrible design flaw in vBulletin. The good news about this is that this will let FOSS forum software solutions more costumers.

It is interesting to see vB as a case of a product reaching critical mass feature mass and eventually destroy itself, hopefully 3.5 can last a couple of years more in my forums.

Actually, this version has more security, more options, handles the high server loads, and fixes problems we had earlier. If it weren't for the need to rebuild the theme from scratch, and the slowness to do the record number of people online at times, it would be easily seen as a vaste improvement.