PDA

View Full Version : Linux v Windows


Antkin
February 25th, 2008, 09:10 PM
Linux v Windows

Microsoft Windows is much more vulnerable to attack than other common operating systems such as MAC or Linux. One reason is that from a security point of view it simply isn't as well put together.

It is possible that email and browser-based viruses, Trojans and worms are the source of the myth that Windows is attacked more often than Linux. Clearly there are more desktop installations of Windows than Linux. It is certainly possible, if not probable, that Windows desktop software is attacked more often because Windows dominates the desktop. But this leaves an important question unanswered. Do the attacks so often succeed on Windows because the attacks are so numerous, or because there are inherent design flaws and poor design decisions in Windows?

Linux facts

Fewer viruses
More stable
Less restarts after installing updates
Security designed from the ground up
Open Source, no costly programs to install
Better file system, no waiting for defragmentation of the hard drive


Linux has no technical support by my ISP Virgin Media yet it works on their cable network, these pages are written by a Linux user with a broadband cable connection.

Linux is suited to a Ethernet modem connector (RJ45) this is found on the back of a Surfboard 5100 modem for example. The other end plugs into your network connection or card on the back of your case/laptop.


Ethernet Routers versus USB Modems

If you have a broadband connection and use a USB modem to connect with, the risks are much greater than if you use an Ethernet router. Unfortunately, most people do use USB modems as they are cheaper to buy, and many ISP's even give them away free to new customers.

So what's the difference? Well with a USB modem your computer is directly connected to the Internet and can be seen by ' port scanners' looking for vulnerable PCs to attack. Unless you have a Firewall for protection then your PC is wide open and will soon become infected with different pieces of malicious software.

Routers on the other hand give increased security as they use NAT (Network Address Translation). With NAT your computer connects only to the router, and it is the router that connects to the Internet, hiding your PC and acting as a buffer. Most routers (including those supplied by The Phone Co-op) also come with a built-in firewall, providing extra security.

Routers also take the load off your PC, give a faster connection in certain instances, and can have more than one port or socket, allowing you to share the Internet connection between more than one computer or other device. All-in-all they are a much better option.

Antony Perkin

twodayslate
February 25th, 2008, 09:55 PM
But does Linux have CS3?

igknighted
February 25th, 2008, 10:14 PM
But does Linux have CS3?

I bet about 0.1% of people OWN a license to any CS3 product, while far more suffer from malware and other problems. In this case, his focal points are most likely more valid. Even the (relatively) small gaming community has more clout in this argument, as there are more gamers than CS3 users.

Any program that costs over $1,000 (or over $500 really) becomes more important than the OS you choose to run it on. The price of windows is almost unimportant when you are dropping $1500 for CS3. It's a niche/specialty application and nothing more. Gimp/Krita are more than capable of serving the needs of all but the most dedicated photo hobbyists/professionals.

hhhhhx
February 25th, 2008, 10:18 PM
I bet about 0.1% of people OWN a license to any CS3 product, while far more suffer from malware and other problems. In this case, his focal points are most likely more valid. Even the (relatively) small gaming community has more clout in this argument, as there are more gamers than CS3 users.

Any program that costs over $1,000 (or over $500 really) becomes more important than the OS you choose to run it on. The price of windows is almost unimportant when you are dropping $1500 for CS3. It's a niche/specialty application and nothing more. Gimp/Krita are more than capable of serving the needs of all but the most dedicated photo hobbyists/professionals.
I HAVE a license, does that count? :lolflag:

Vitamin-Carrot
February 25th, 2008, 10:42 PM
Another fact that windows is more open to infections than other OS's is that it has more users. The types of users range in tech know how from ultimate beginner to God of all things that go beep so of course there will be a few in the middle of that scale that wont have a concept of not only surfing safe but how surf smart.

Newbie joe blogs will receive an e-mail from an unknown source or a friend with an infected machine with an attachment and download it to theirs without knowing what it is or what it does. It the same with their surfing behaviour, they will be prompted with an active X control or a popup they think is a OS message and click on it.

Software pirates on windows are especially susceptible to such infection, any number of cracks keygens and so called patches will have a nasty in them. Newbie joe blogs might not want to pay for CS3 and download a crack or keygen for it while the crack/keygen would be in the compressed file other files would be there as well that of course joe blogs would click on and then boom its a popup bomb or Trojan horse or worm.

So its not just holes that can allow the infection of an OS its also the user.

igknighted
February 26th, 2008, 01:43 AM
Another fact that windows is more open to infections than other OS's is that it has more users. The types of users range in tech know how from ultimate beginner to God of all things that go beep so of course there will be a few in the middle of that scale that wont have a concept of not only surfing safe but how surf smart.

Newbie joe blogs will receive an e-mail from an unknown source or a friend with an infected machine with an attachment and download it to theirs without knowing what it is or what it does. It the same with their surfing behaviour, they will be prompted with an active X control or a popup they think is a OS message and click on it.

Software pirates on windows are especially susceptible to such infection, any number of cracks keygens and so called patches will have a nasty in them. Newbie joe blogs might not want to pay for CS3 and download a crack or keygen for it while the crack/keygen would be in the compressed file other files would be there as well that of course joe blogs would click on and then boom its a popup bomb or Trojan horse or worm.

So its not just holes that can allow the infection of an OS its also the user.

The difference is that "newbie joe blogs" would be ok if he/she clicked that attachment in linux. Without root privileges, not much would be at risk. And most software would be free of charge and available through the repositories. Bad packages from unofficial sources are of course a worry, but there's less reason to use them in linux.

futureproof
February 27th, 2008, 08:27 PM
Linux vs Windows is a topic that has been covered here ad nauseum, I really don't know what purpose it serves. However here is my view on Linux vs Windows. There is no versus other than that which is fabricated by some people. I use XP pro, Vista Ultimate and Ubuntu 7.10. Each has it's strengths and weaknesses, they all work perfectly with the hardware I have, they all work perfectly with my fibre connection. I see little difference in performance between them, windows is secured as best my knowledge will allow, linux is also secure, other than paying for windows and a few games the rest of the software I use is free. I used windows for a very long time and know it quite well, I am slowly learning to use linux more.

So for me the only differnce between them is their position in my boot menu.