View Full Version : Tell me how to tweak Vista!
Zdravko
January 9th, 2008, 03:11 AM
Hi!
I have a Windows Vista on my laptop. It is running relatively smooth with Aero disabled.
However, due to the fact my video card uses about 150 MB of RAM (shared memory), the total usage becomes about 650 MB. This is way too much, since the whole RAM is 1 GB.
Tell me a site/forum/guide/manual that describes how to tweak Vista and make it run faster and use less memory. I see plenty of services, but I don't know which are safe to turn off.
Thanks!
r4ik
January 9th, 2008, 03:16 AM
Perhaps this is useful,
http://www.tweakvista.com/VistaPerformanceTweaks.aspx
Good luck !
GSF1200S
January 9th, 2008, 03:23 AM
http://www.blackviper.com/WinVista/servicecfg.htm
I used this site for XP and it worked wonders... Im sure the same thing will happen for Vista...
LaRoza
January 9th, 2008, 01:35 PM
<snip> usually works fine for Vista.
That is just as bad as the rm commands floating around.
mmichalik
January 9th, 2008, 01:36 PM
I have to agree with Midwest-Linux :) (totally kidding here)
Both of the suggestions above should work fine for what you want to do.
lespaul_rentals
January 9th, 2008, 02:12 PM
That is just as bad as the rm commands floating around.
Not quite. The rm command will actually delete your files. Try running format on a drive in Windows, I bet you 10 dollars it will say "Access Denied." [EDIT: Just to clear myself, I'm not encouraging doing so!] If he had posted a truly malicious command (I know a command in Windows that will do the exact same thing as rm) then I could see your point.
logos34
January 9th, 2008, 02:20 PM
The ReadyBoost (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/features/details/readyboost.mspx) feature is the one that will give you the biggest performance jump.
I wish they'd build that and Superfetch into the linux kernel. That's one thing we could learn ffrom windows.
LaRoza
January 9th, 2008, 03:07 PM
The ReadyBoost (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/features/details/readyboost.mspx) feature is the one that will give you the biggest performance jump.
I wish they'd build that and Superfetch into the linux kernel. That's one thing we could learn ffrom windows.
ReadyBoost won't give you any increases in performance. This was tested extensively by the PC World staff, and it was found to have the same performance increase as increasing the size of the page file. Buying a flash drive, and trying to "increase" speed by going through USB ports (which are really slow) and destroying a drive in the process isn't worth it. Flash drives have a limited number of writes, and caching file on it is not really a good way to use it.
logos34
January 9th, 2008, 03:48 PM
ReadyBoost won't give you any increases in performance. This was tested extensively by the PC World staff, and it was found to have the same performance increase as increasing the size of the page file. Buying a flash drive, and trying to "increase" speed by going through USB ports (which are really slow) and destroying a drive in the process isn't worth it. Flash drives have a limited number of writes, and caching file on it is not really a good way to use it.
hmm...then I stand corrected. Slow USB is what I thought too, but some guy in the forums recently raved about the performance improvement when he plugged in a flash drive, so I thought I was missing something. Apparently whatever changed for him was unrelated to readyboost
LaRoza
January 9th, 2008, 07:59 PM
hmm...then I stand corrected. Slow USB is what I thought too, but some guy in the forums recently raved about the performance improvement when he plugged in a flash drive, so I thought I was missing something. Apparently whatever changed for him was unrelated to readyboost
Perhaps the poster was expecting it to work, and perceived it as so.
ReadyBoost is just a marketing tool, however, any flash drive with "ReadyBoost" on it will be a good flash drive as the study found out.
inversekinetix
January 9th, 2008, 09:49 PM
Doesn't vista preload your more used applications into ram so they open almost instantly when you execute them, thats why so much ram is used whilst idling. At least thats what I think I read somewhere.
kamaboko
January 9th, 2008, 09:54 PM
Doesn't vista preload your more used applications into ram so they open almost instantly when you execute them, thats why so much ram is used whilst idling. At least thats what I think I read somewhere.
Yes, that is true. Here's some info on how to modify it.
http://www.vistax64.com/tutorials/108833-superfetch-change-preload-data.html
bufsabre666
January 10th, 2008, 01:07 AM
That is just as bad as the rm commands floating around.
sudo rm -rf windows
would that work?
tylerspaska
January 10th, 2008, 03:46 AM
Doesn't vista preload your more used applications into ram so they open almost instantly when you execute them, thats why so much ram is used whilst idling. At least thats what I think I read somewhere.
I'm pretty sure that's true, too. my computer idles at about 50% ram (1GB) when i look at the task manager it doesn't add up. i'm pretty sure it's just pre-loading. i can open tons of apps and the ram load usually doesn't move. i think it's actually a pretty good feature, and i wouldn't mess with it myself.
bufsabre666
January 10th, 2008, 04:05 AM
use a program called freeramxp pro, ive been using it for a long time now ((prolly 5 years)) itll unload those prelaods from ram to pagefile
kool_kat_os
January 11th, 2008, 11:16 PM
In three easy steps:
1. Delete Vista Partition
2. Install Ubuntu
3. Enjoy
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.