View Full Version : graphical python libraries
bribaetz
October 28th, 2007, 04:29 PM
as far as python graphical libraries which is easiest to learn and as far as making simple calculator or word processor programs which is best i learned a little TKinter. but which is ultimately more convenient.
smartbei
October 28th, 2007, 04:35 PM
I have used both Tkinter and GTK and I have found both usable, though TK was far faster to build in. For a calculator you could probably get away with using whatever, since it would be very small and simple. A word processor (depending on complexity of course) is probably (again, depending on the complexity) beyond my ability to advise.
bribaetz
October 28th, 2007, 04:37 PM
thanks
LaRoza
October 29th, 2007, 12:14 PM
My wiki has several libraries listed for Python. wxPython is very good and easier than Tkinter, but better looking.
happysmileman
October 29th, 2007, 01:12 PM
Description of a few (http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/928/)
Personally I think QT and wxWidgets would be fairly suitable for Python and they are both object-oriented and easy to read. In my opinion QT seems easier, though I haven't used wxWidgets in a while.
GTK is just as good as the other two mentioned, but I don't know if the Python bindings are object-oriented, also i've never used GTK since I'm a KDE fanboy so QT is the obvious choice for me.
dataw0lf
October 29th, 2007, 03:27 PM
wxPython is nearly as cross platform as Tkinter; I'd suggest looking into it once you're familiar with Tkinter. There are some small gotchas in wxPython, due to it largely being a straight mapping to the wxWidgets C++ library, but they're fairly easy to overcome.
LaRoza
October 29th, 2007, 04:28 PM
GTK is just as good as the other two mentioned, but I don't know if the Python bindings are object-oriented, also i've never used GTK since I'm a KDE fanboy so QT is the obvious choice for me.
How well does QT handle on Windows?
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.